Companies

Volex and Aberdeen: Big director share deals this week

Find out which directors are buying and selling shares in their own companies

Mark Robinson
Mark Robinson

UK data centre capacity is set to expand rapidly over the next five years. The country had around 1.6 gigawatts (GW) of data centre capacity at the start of last year, much of which was concentrated in Greater London, but analysis suggests that it could conceivably hit 6.3GW by the end of the decade. However, the UK’s grid capacity constraints are likely to have a significant bearing on the rate of expansion.

The scale of the developments have provided fertile ground for related supply chains. The benefits were certainly clear enough in Volex’s (VLX) recent interim figures, which detailed a 43 per cent uplift in reported profits. The group manufactures power and data connectivity cables, so it's not difficult to appreciate why its prospects have improved in line with the spread of artificial intelligence technologies. The improved sentiment towards the stock has been reflected in a succession of analyst upgrades.

Improved confidence is also apparent in recent purchases by newly appointed group chair Dave Webster, who snapped up £622,000-worth of shares over several trading sessions midway through December.

Despite a 47 per cent increase in market valuation over the past 12 months, the group’s shares trade at 14.7 times forecast earnings – ahead of the five-year average but relatively modest compared with the majority of its supply chain peers. The shares offer 8 per cent upside based on FactSet consensus, and a price/earnings growth ratio of 1.2 times suggests that the current rating isn’t overly ambitious. MR


Siobhan Boylan joined Aberdeen (ABDN) as chief financial officer shortly after the asset manager, previously known as Abrdn, decided to restore its vowels after enduring several years of mockery. She previously held the top finance position at Coutts & Co, the private banking arm of NatWest. To compensate her for the remuneration she forfeited on leaving Coutts, she was handed a one-off award of 84,663 shares with various vesting tranches over a five-year period from March 2026 onwards.

Following on from the pay compensation, Boylan signalled her faith by acquiring just under £150,000-worth of shares. Her optimism chimes with that of the market judging by the 45 per cent increase in the group’s market valuation over the past 12 months, albeit from a low base. The reality is that the shares peaked a decade ago, and have only recently climbed above the level they were trading at when Aberdeen purchased investment platform Interactive Investor in May 2022.

Nonetheless, the group has made progress in trimming its cost-to-income ratio, achieving £137mn in run rate savings over the first half of 2025. Unfortunately, the period also featured further net outflows due to the termination of a single, low-fee mandate, although overall assets under management were heading in the right direction, largely thanks to an improved showing from Interactive Investor.

Time will tell if Boylan’s faith will be rewarded. But the shares come with an implied dividend yield of 7.2 per cent, along with a sizeable discount to net assets. The accompanying price-to-book ratio of 0.8 could point to undervaluation, but further retracement rests on how Aberdeen’s turnaround plan counters the impact of increased passive investing, among various other industry challenges. MR

Buys        
Company Director/PDMR Date Price (p) Aggregate value (£)
Aberdeen Group Siobhan Boylan (cfo) 17-Dec 196.6 149,993
Cavendish  Lisa Gordon (ch) 17-Dec 9.6 43,200
Checkit Kit Kyte (ce) 18-19 Dec 20 36,482
Future Kevin Li Ying (ce) 12-Dec 550.9 49,737
Future Sharjeel Suleman (cfo) 12-Dec 545.9 24,874
Future Mark Brooker 12-Dec 552.6 39,795
Glenveagh Properties John Mulcahy (ch) † 15-Dec 1,692 253,938
Glenveagh Properties Pat McCann 15-Dec 1,703 255,398
Grainger Michael Keaveney (PDMR) 18-19 Dec 181.5 81,357
Hikma Pharmaceuticals Mazen Darwazah 19-Dec 1,498.6 1,498,580
Hunting Stuart Brightman 12-Dec 387.7 77,532
Lancashire Holdings Philip Broadley (ch) 12-Dec 594 33,145
Land Securities Anne Richards 18-Dec 603 99,485
MediaZest Keith Edelman (ch) 17-Dec 0.9 500,000
MediaZest James Abdool 17-Dec 0.85 500,000
Restore Charles Skinner (ce) 18-Dec 272.7 29,999
Serica Energy Christopher Cox (ce) 16-Dec 170 108,747
Victoria Philippe Hamers (ce) 17-18 Dec 32.5-39.5 49,508
Volex Dave Webster (ch) 8-12 Dec 404-407 622,000
Workspace  Rosie Shapland 16-Dec 383 34,459
Sells        
Company Director/PDMR Date Price (p) Aggregate value (£)
Boot (Henry) Nicholas J. Duckworth (PDMR) 16-Dec 222 53,280
Galliford Try Mark Baxter (PDMR) * 18-Dec 523-525 261,080
Georgia Capital Irakli Gilauri (ce & ch) 17-19 Dec 2,997-3,000 4,047,000
International Consolidated Airlines Jorge Saco (PDMR) 15-Dec 415.2 249,120
LendInvest Ian Thomas (PDMR) 15-16 Dec 34 126,375
LendInvest Christian Faes 15-16 Dec 34 126,375
Sirius Real Estate Annemie Ress (PDMR) 15-Dec 91.6 40,348
Tate & Lyle Glenn Fish † ★ 17-Dec 1,512 75,602
United Utilities Michael Gauterin (PDMR) 18-Dec 1,184 118,427
*All or part of deal conducted by spouse / family / close associate. † Translated from US$/€. ★ ADRs
Companies

Next & Sainsbury: Stock market week ahead – 5-9 Jan

A summary of key company announcements expected in the coming week

Mark Robinson
Mark Robinson

Monday 5 January

Economics: Consumer credit, M4 money supply, mortgage approvals

Companies paying dividends: Bunzl (20.2p), Montanaro European Smaller Companies (0.4p), Next (87p), Tate & Lyle (6.6p), TwentyFour Select Monthly Income (0.5p)


Tuesday 6 January

Trading updates: Next (NXT), Sainsbury (J) (SBRY)

Companies paying dividends: BlackRock Energy And Resources Income Trust (1.25p), Castings (4.21p)


Wednesday 7 January

Companies paying dividends: Caffyns (5p), Great Portland Estates (2.9p), Hill & Smith (18p), Liontrust Asset Management (7p), Focusrite (2.1p), Zegona Communications (€1.86) 


Thursday 8 January

Economics: Halifax house price index

Trading updates: Greggs (GRG)

AGMs: Applied Nutrition (APN)

Companies paying dividends: Caledonia Investments (3.68p), Chelverton UK Dividend Trust (2.5p), CMC Markets (5.5p), LondonMetric Property (3.05p), Michelmersh Brick Holdings (1.6p), TR Property Investment Trust (5.75p), VH Global Energy Infrastructure (1.45p), Volex (1.6p), GSK (16p), Town Centre Securities (2.5p)


Friday 9 January

Trading updates: Unite (UTG)

Companies paying dividends: 3i (36.5p), ICG (27.7p), JPMorgan European Growth & Income (1.2p), Land Securities (19p), Lion Finance (73.4601p), Marks and Spencer (1.2p), Oxford Instruments (5.4p), Pets At Home (4.7p), Polar Capital Holdings (14p), Regional Reit (2.5p), Supreme (1.6p), UIL (2p), Worldwide Healthcare Trust (0.7p), Zigup (8.8p), Associated British Foods (42.3p)

Companies going ex-dividend on 8 January
Company Dividend Pay date
Ecora Resources $0.006 30-Jan
Facilities by ADF 0.3p 30-Jan
Bisichi 3p 6-Feb
Smiths News 6.8p 5-Feb
TBC Bank GEL1.75 10-Feb
Experian $0.2125 6-Feb
Scottish Oriental Smaller 3.4p 6-Feb
ProVen Growth and Income VCT 1.25p 30-Jan
ProVen VCT 1.5p 30-Jan
Qinetiq 3p 6-Feb
Greencore 2.6p 5-Feb
Workspace 9.4p 2-Feb
Sage 14.4p 10-Feb
Jet2 4.5p 13-Feb
XPS Pensions 4.1p 6-Feb
Mitie 1.4p 20-Feb
CT UK High Income 1.37p 6-Feb
CT UK High Income B 1.37p 6-Feb
FIH 1.25p 13-Feb
Franklin Global Trust 0.9p 30-Jan
Schroder European Real Estate € 0.0148 6-Feb
Baillie Gifford European Growth 0.72p 13-Feb
Ashtead $0.375 6-Feb
Cohort 5.8p 17-Feb
dotDigital 1.21p 30-Jan
Hargreave Hale AIM VCT 3p 13-Feb
Economics

Setting the tone for 2026: Economic week ahead: 5-9 January

US payroll figures are back on track – operationally speaking, that is

Dan Jones
Dan Jones

The US economic calendar has finally caught up following last year’s government shutdown. Unemployment figures for December will be released as scheduled next Friday, and could set the tone for the year ahead.

Even prompt data can quickly prove out of date. November’s figures, released in mid-December, showed the unemployment rate ticking up to 4.6 per cent. But some of the recent weakness stems from government job numbers – notice periods meant lay-offs made by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency at the start of 2025 filtered through in October and, to a lesser extent, November. Private sector hiring, by contrast, has been relatively resilient so far.

Monday 5 January

Japan: Manufacturing PMI

UK: Consumer credit, M4 money supply, mortgage approvals

US: ISM manufacturing PMI


Tuesday 6 January

Eurozone: Composite & services PMIs

UK: BRC shop price index

US: Composite & services PMIs


Wednesday 7 January

Eurozone: CPI inflation

Japan: Services PMI

UK: Construction PMI

US: ISM services PMI


Thursday 8 January

China: Imports/exports, trade balance

Eurozone: Consumer confidence, industrial confidence, unemployment

Japan: Consumer confidence, machine tool orders

UK: Halifax house price index


Friday 9 January

China: CPI inflation, M2 money supply

Eurozone: Retail sales

Japan: Leading economic index

US: Michigan consumer sentiment (preliminary), unemployment

News

The commodities to buy in 2026

Precious metals and copper soared last year, but there are divergent views on what the new year means for natural resources

Alex Hamer
Alex Hamer

Gold and silver rallied in the days leading up to Christmas, giving precious metals investors yet another gift in 2025.

Gold’s move to almost $4,500 (£3,330) an ounce (oz) came from continued Chinese central bank and retail buying, alongside a weaker dollar. Copper also hit a new all-time high as traders stayed at their desks during the run-up to 25 December, climbing to almost $12,000 a tonne. 

But there were also surprise winners in 2025, where prices surged due to government action or worries over future supplies.

This included cobalt, after the Democratic Republic of Congo suspended exports; tungsten, driven up because of its use in military equipment and Chinese dominance in the market; and platinum group metals, pushed up by investment buying and declining mine output.

Looking ahead, several analysts think lithium will climb further next year, after gaining some price momentum in the last months of 2025. The metal has been in oversupply for years after a rush of investment early in the electric vehicle (EV) boom.

This cycle has happened several times in the past decade. The most recent bull run was 2022, when the lithium carbonate price hit $80,000 a tonne.

This year, the low was $8,300 a tonne in June, before a final-quarter rebound saw it rise to $13,350 a tonne, as per FactSet.

Lithium prices are volatile because of the abundant reserves in South America and Australia, with mines quick to reach production (in Australia particularly). Several major operations are currently suspended due to low prices.

The principal demand focus has been EVs, but lower growth than expected a few years ago has hit the market. EV sales hit 18.5mn globally in the year to November, according to energy consultancy Rho Motion. This compares with 6.6mn in 2021, and still represented a 21 per cent increase on the same period in 2024. 

But the 2025 enthusiasm for lithium came from stationary energy storage, often used alongside renewables to ensure consistency of electricity supply. UBS analysts said this could be a “game changer” for lithium, sending up demand significantly within a few years.

This has sent the bank’s price forecast for lithium carbonate for next year up from $11,000 a tonne to $16,500. 

The rally in recent months emerged because of a shift in stationary storage forecasts. In September, the Chinese government said it would double “new energy storage” capacity to 180 gigawatts (GW) within two years. This “represents a substantial boost to market forecasts”, said BMO, which also highlighted the $35bn in spending pledged alongside the goal.

Analysts there said lithium demand for stationary storage climbed 40 per cent in 2025, to around 260,000 tonnes, and should climb again to almost 300,000 tonnes in 2026. This is less sharp year-on-year growth, but would still be enough to help prices.

Panmure Liberum put lithium in its top three gainers for 2026, just behind natural gas and thermal coal. Looking further ahead, the broker’s top three for the next five years are Brent crude, cobalt and lithium, with gains of around 50 per cent for the battery metals and 30 per cent for oil. 

Bernstein thinks it will take a while for lithium to really get going. “An inflection is coming [a year faster than we previously thought] and our 2028 and 2029 estimates are much higher than consensus as we see potential deficit due to potentially higher demand for [energy storage] battery, and medium- and heavy-duty vehicle battery,” the US bank’s analysts said.

That translates to a price forecast of $20,000 a tonne in 2028, although Bernstein also thinks prices for the next two years will be flat. 

London lithium names should ultimately benefit, although given most are developers, not producers, this will be sentiment rather than profit-driven. 

Top of the tree for Panmure Liberum for 2026 is thermal coal, because it thinks China will curb local production and raise imports. Thermal coal, used in power stations, has largely traded around $100 a tonne on flat demand in recent years.

Bullish observers see a shift in pricing coming from supply: investors are unwilling to put up cash for new projects, and so it will get more and more difficult to feed coal power plants. 

But there is a race between utilities switching to lower-emission technologies such as gas and renewables and supply dropping off. In the short term, UBS painted the opposite picture to Panmure.

“Thermal coal is trading at [around] $110 a tonne and remains above support levels; we expect seaborne prices to be rangebound in 2026 with China domestic supply to recover and Brent/gas prices expected to remain soft,” they said. 

Another common pick for 2026 is cobalt. “We have revised our cobalt forecast upwards due to delays in DR Congo exports under the new quota regime, which combined with a three-month transit time to China, is expected to keep the Chinese market tight and prices elevated in the first half of 2026,” said analysts at BMO.

They also backed copper and gold for further gains, and said volatility in artificial intelligence (AI)-linked equities could be good for metals buyers: “We think an AI bubble pop could represent a strong buying opportunity for some commodities, assuming no major wider economic turmoil.” These would be copper, aluminium and uranium.

Companies

Why life insurers are still an income play

Non-life insurers are experiencing greater pricing pressures

Mark Robinson
Mark Robinson

Whenever you assess prospects for the insurance industry, you’re essentially looking over your shoulder. That’s because risk assessments and premium rates are predicted on historical events to a significant degree. Actuarial models place the emphasis on claims data and previous outcomes to set premiums and predict future losses. “Let the past serve the future,” as Mao Zedong was fond of saying.

One potential drawback from this traditional – some might say ‘outdated’ – approach is that it doesn’t take adequate account of emerging risks such as cyber attacks. But the industry is responding to the changing backdrop, so we are witnessing a gradual shift towards the use of machine learning and algorithms to assess risk more accurately. As with so many other evolving administrative functions, it will probably settle on a hybrid approach eventually, although some industry analysts believe that, rather than a complementary approach, insurance processes will need to be totally revolutionised to extract full value from generative artificial intelligence (AI).

If nothing else, the digital transformation will gain impetus because of the imperative to deliver more with less. It could be argued that the expense ratio (operating costs as a percentage of earned premiums) has become more keenly appreciated ever since the industry largely abandoned the mutualised model. Keeping a lid on costs takes on a different complexion when you’re compelled to generate profits.

The focus on cost control also intensifies when you’re intent on funding distributions to shareholders. The broader financials sector is a major contributor to the UK’s dividend pool, with insurance as a key component. Income seekers will be acutely aware that a handful of industry stocks – Aviva (AV.), Legal & General (LGEN), Phoenix (PHNX) and Admiral (ADM) – are among the highest-yielding plays within the FTSE 100. Admittedly, some are broad-based financials, as opposed to insurance pure plays, but in many cases the current ratings are hard to fathom given the total returns on offer.

With this in mind, what are industry prospects for 2026? There is something of a divergence where life and non-life insurers are concerned. It’s thought the latter industry segment will report underwriting profits for the past year despite increased claims from one-off weather events. The trouble is that non-life insurers are experiencing greater pricing pressures, with margin erosion likely across the reinsurance and commercial channels. Elsewhere, some support is provided through the expansion of third-party litigation funding.

After the initial lull in claims brought about by the pandemic lockdowns, motor insurance underwriters failed to adequately price the resultant claims inflation and supply chain disruption, squeezing margins in the process. The market turned profitable in 2024, but it is now thought that claims could outpace premiums during 2026 due to intensifying competition.

The UK life insurance market is also likely to experience slowing premium growth, although the outlook is certainly more favourable. The bulk annuity market continues to bubble up on the back of improved funding levels for defined-benefit pension schemes. Gilt yields could well contract in response to sluggish growth in the economy, but this is unlikely to derail the bulk business trend.

There have been fewer ‘megadeals’ completed in 2025, according to a recent survey conducted by City law firm Simmons & Simmons, although that is set against a greater number of smaller and mid-sized deals. So the likes of Legal & General, Phoenix (via Standard Life) and M&G (MNG) have continued to make merry in this corner of the life market, helped along by a new business pipeline cemented by an ageing population. Competition is on the rise, however.

Looking at specific valuations, UBS ranks Aviva, Phoenix and Prudential (PRU) as ‘buys’ within its coverage. The investment bank is wary over prospects for insurers with emerging market exposure, but it maintains that the last of the trio could “deliver double-digit earnings growth, with circa 20 per cent of the market cap potentially returned to shareholders over the next three years”. That may seem a tad ambitious, but management has already signed off on a $500mn (£371mn) buyback for 2026 and a commitment to growing dividends by more than 10 per cent annually up to 2027.

One point worth taking on board in view of recent speculation is that insurers with outsized exposure to capital markets could find the going tough in 2026 if risk appetite were to reverse. It’s conceivable that the gradual cessation of the Japanese carry trade – or simply the fear thereof – could result in an accelerated sale of bonds and equities. Admittedly, there have been rumblings about this potential threat to liquidity for some time, but some insurers could conceivably end up with unrealised losses and deteriorating investment performance depending on how they have allocated their reserve capital. The Solvency II framework should limit the systemic risk.

Funds

How fund firms are positioned for 2026

How asset managers feel about bonds and stocks going into the new year

Val Cipriani
Val Cipriani

A potential artificial intelligence (AI) bubble, inflation, tariffs, high levels of government debt… the list of investors’ concerns going into 2026 is long. And yet almost all equity markets across the world have had an excellent 2025, and for now optimism looks set to continue into the new year.

Of course, the mood can change very quickly. But a look at fund manager firms’ outlooks for 2026 tells us that many of them are again going into the new year feeling fairly hopeful.

As we do every six months, we have compared the tactical asset allocation positions set by a range of investment management firms, looking at sentiment towards major equity and fixed income markets. The results are displayed in the chart below, which shows the proportion of managers examined who are positive, neutral or negative towards a certain asset class or region.

These outlooks don’t have the ability to accurately predict what is going to happen to markets across the world. But they are still a useful way of getting a sense of how experts are thinking about what lies ahead.

It’s difficult to find a notable stock market that truly performed poorly in 2025, with the exception of India’s sterling-based returns. The chart below illustrates the returns of major equity markets, again in sterling terms.

Compared with other regions, the performance of the S&P 500 was somewhat muted, especially after years of the US being firmly ahead of the pack.

In 2025, currency movements (namely, the weakening of the dollar) had a major impact on returns – in dollar terms, the S&P 500 returned almost double (12.1 per cent) its sterling-based return over the same period. Still, global investors are clearly starting to pay more attention to other regions that had been neglected.

And yet, fund companies appear more optimistic about US stocks than they were six months ago. For example, Franklin Templeton has switched its view from “reasons for concern” to “reasons for optimism” for both growth and value US stocks. On growth stocks, it cites economic growth holding up well “despite some weakness in the labour market, while relatively strong profitability and healthy cash flows have been supporting large-cap AI names”, as well as strong earnings – although the team admits that trade policy is still “a key risk”.

Meanwhile, strategists at Aviva are among those pushing back against too much ‘bubble’ talk. “For 2026, we maintain a bullish view on equities largely driven by the broadening of the AI theme and the recovery in the industrial and other ‘traditional cyclical’ sectors,” they say. That recovery is what makes them question the idea of an AI bubble – instead, they think we may “have in fact gone through a traditional cyclical downturn, offset by a powerful technology cycle that happened to coincide with that downturn”.

However, valuations remain a key concern. The Fidelity team, which takes a neutral stance on the US market and has been doing so for a while, says: “Earnings have continued to surprise positively, but valuations are full, particularly in the information technology sector. Strength is still concentrated in large-cap tech, but is showing signs of broadening.”

And HSBC notes that “the disproportionate dependence” of earnings growth on AI investment is “the key vulnerability”; its analysts don’t rule out that AI could continue to drive US stocks, but say there are “plenty of reasons why investors could benefit from increased allocations outside of the US”.

Overall, the feeling on AI seems to be “so far so good”, but with some caveats – perhaps the most important one being that at some point, US tech companies will need to show that all that capital expenditure on AI and data centres has been worth it, particularly as they start funding this spend through debt rather than just cash flows.

As BlackRock puts it: “The challenge for investors: reconciling the huge capital spending plans with the potential AI revenues. Will their orders of magnitude match?”

Despite its optimism, Aviva’s team thinks we could see some market jitters next year. “The market’s patience around vast AI-related capex spend might start to be tested later in 2026, as visibility improves on earnings and return on investment,” they say.

The UK and Europe both attract mixed reviews. Franklin Templeton is fairly bearish on the UK, arguing that the country is facing “significant macro headwinds, including slowing growth and labour market weakness”, that earnings are not looking too great, and that this is a defensive equity region and “we are not in a defensive environment for risk assets”.

BlackRock, which keeps a neutral stance, says that “valuations remain attractive relative to the US, but we see few near-term catalysts to trigger a shift”. Meanwhile, JPMorgan strikes a more positive tone, praising the market’s “attractive dividend yield and higher free cash flows”.

Firms that are positive on Europe mostly cite improved earnings. At the opposite end of the spectrum, Franklin Templeton’s team say they are “moderately bearish” because of a weaker macroeconomic outlook and exposure to slowing demand from China. Fidelity, which is neutral, argues that following this year’s run “valuations are no longer cheap, and the strengthening euro could start weighing on large-cap equity earnings”.

There is widespread enthusiasm for both Japan and emerging markets. A lot appears to be going right for Japanese equities, with outlooks mentioning corporate reforms, strong GDP growth, improving earnings and a growth-oriented government as reasons for optimism. Fidelity upgrades the country’s market to an overweight position, but with a focus on mid-cap companies, which “offer more room for improvement than large caps and should benefit from domestic stimulus”, it argues.

As for emerging markets, Fidelity says it is overweight due to a “higher conviction in China, where we believe recent rallies have been better supported by fundamentals”, as well as a positive outlook on India and Korea.

HSBC is specifically bullish on the region’s role in the AI boom. “China and broader emerging markets exemplify why looking beyond US megacaps for the next wave can be beneficial,” the asset manager says. “China, for example, is frequently underestimated in its AI potential.”

But it depends where you look – BlackRock strikes a cautious note on emerging markets as a whole. “Economic resilience has improved, yet selectivity is key,” the firm’s outlook reads. “We see opportunities across emerging markets linked to AI and the energy transition, and see the rewiring of supply chains benefiting countries like Mexico, Brazil and Vietnam.”

On balance, government bonds attract the most pessimism across the various outlooks, with high levels of debt across developed countries often flagged as a concern. For example, HSBC’s outlook argues that fiscal risk could be behind the next global macroeconomic shock, and that US Treasuries can no longer be relied upon as a defensive asset when stock markets go through downturns.

“The regime that allowed US government bonds to reliably offset equity drawdowns was based on three conditions: inflation anchored near 2 per cent, fiscal discipline that preserved sovereign credibility, and monetary policy capable of easing aggressively without constraint,” HSBC’s outlook explains. “None of these conditions fully hold today.”

However, fund companies are in fact quite positive on UK gilts, mostly because of the base rate cuts expected next year. As Franklin Templeton’s people put it: “Given the weak macro environment, we believe market expectations for interest rate cuts are too conservative, although sticky inflation may make the Bank of England cautious.”

As is often the case, investor interest in Japan doesn’t translate to enthusiasm for its bonds. This is the only area where BlackRock is significantly underweight, with its outlook stating: “Rate hikes, higher global term premium and heavy bond issuance will likely drive yields up further.” And Aviva calls the independence of the Bank of Japan (BoJ) into question: “Persistent political influence over the BoJ remains a key obstacle to monetary policy normalisation, despite elevated inflation.”

Despite tight credit spreads, managers are slightly more positive on corporate bonds. As HSBC puts it, “high-quality credit increasingly serves as a substitute for traditional duration, particularly in jurisdictions where fiscal trajectories weaken the defensive characteristics of government bonds”.

Finally, asset managers appear fairly keen on alternative assets, including commodities, as a source of protection against inflation – although opinions on gold differ after its huge rally. “Gold is an effective diversifier in an environment of unstable bond-equity correlations and the role of the dollar is challenged, although we are cautious of how far it has run,” says Fidelity. “We are positive on real assets more generally, particularly commodities such as copper, as a hedge against inflation re-accelerating.”

“We see [gold] more as a tactical play with distinct return drivers and are sceptical of its role as a long-term portfolio hedge,” adds BlackRock, which argues in favour of seeking diversification in a very “active” manner, for example through private markets and hedge funds.

FINANCIAL PLANNING AND EDUCATION

‘Can I double my portfolio and reach £1mn in five years?’

Portfolio Clinic: Our reader wants aggressive growth, but his goal may not be realistic. Val Cipriani takes a look

Val Cipriani
Val Cipriani

Setting an ambitious goal is a good way to motivate yourself when investing – even if success takes a little longer than hoped.

Fred is 46 and has about £450,000 split between his Isas and general investment accounts, partly thanks to an inheritance received about five years ago. He wants to grow this figure to £1mn by adding about £1,500 a month as well as improving and simplifying his approach.

He says: “I would like advice on how to consolidate my portfolio and build growth, to push to a target of £1mn. In the current climate, would it be possible to achieve this in five years?”

“The challenge is to grow the portfolio while avoiding large capital gains tax liabilities,” he adds. “I try to reinvest all dividends and shelter my investments via bed and Isa transactions as soon as the new tax year arrives.”

A portion of his portfolio sits in an Aberdeen multi-asset fund. The rest is in a mix of investment trusts and funds, plus various single stocks, which Fred says he has recently started dabbling in. “[I have been using] mostly small amounts of spare cash, to learn more about the markets and volatility,” he says.

Fred describes his attitude to risk as being “prepared to lose money in the short term in order to maximise returns in the long term”.

He has recently been replacing some funds he deems “underperforming” with more successful alternatives – RIT Capital (RCP) with Ranmore Global Equity (IE000WSZ17Z4), and Fundsmith Equity (GB00B41YBW71) with Artemis SmartGARP Global Equity (GB00B4PQW151). He is thinking about introducing a position in Phoenix Group (PHNX) or adding to his City of London (CTY) holding in order to increase the portfolio’s dividend income.

“One mistake I made was to invest in the Baillie Gifford China Fund (GB00B39RMM81) just before Covid. I have so far resisted the urge to buy crypto as I feel it’s too unpredictable,” he says.

Once he reaches the £1mn mark, Fred plans to start drawing about £10,000 a year from his investments in order to reduce his working hours. But there’s a lot to consider: he has two children under the age of 10, and would like to be able to help them with university fees and property deposits, when the time comes.

On top of the Isas and general investment accounts, Fred also has separate retirement provisions. He expects to receive the full state pension in due course, and he has £222,000 split between a workplace pension and a Sipp. This is almost entirely invested in global and US equities. He owns his £600,000 flat mortgage-free.

Have your portfolio reviewed by experts

Are you on track to achieve your goals? Do your investments deliver the right returns? Is your financial planning as tax efficient as possible?

If not, head to the Portfolio Clinic. You can have your portfolio analysed by experts who will provide ideas and recommendations to help you.

Email us at portfolio.clinic@ft.com to find out more. To read examples, click here.

This is a free service and all submissions are welcome, whether you are starting or have amassed millions. We don’t reveal your name so your anonymity is guaranteed.

NONE OF THE COMMENTARY BELOW SHOULD BE REGARDED AS ADVICE. IT IS GENERAL INFORMATION BASED ON A SNAPSHOT OF THESE INVESTORS’ CIRCUMSTANCES

Including your monthly contributions, you would need a net annual return rate of approximately 14.4 per cent to grow your £450,000 portfolio to £1mn over five years. To achieve this level of return, you would need a high-risk approach, which could still leave you short of your target – or worse, experiencing a decline in portfolio value should markets act unfavourably over the period.

The good news is that by adopting a slightly lower-risk, diversified, equity-focused approach, you could still reach your objective, albeit over a longer timeframe of approximately eight years. This would be a more measured balance between growth potential and risk.

To reduce duplication within the portfolio, I favour retaining Fidelity Index World (GB00BJS8SJ34) as a core holding, replacing your other global and US trackers with this. The fund is competitively priced with a 0.12 per cent fee. With approximately 1,325 holdings, it is not overly diversified – compared for example with your holding in Vanguard LifeStrategy 80% Equity (GB00B4PQW151), the underlying funds in which invest in more than 24,000 securities. While diversification is important, excessive diversification can hinder performance.

While I appreciate your interest in equity markets and trends, direct stock investing can lead to unintended concentration risks. For example, Nvidia (US:NVDA) is a stock you hold directly and is also featured in several funds you own, meaning your overall exposure is likely to be higher than intended.

To achieve the required level of growth, your portfolio will need to be predominantly equity-based. In addition to the Fidelity Index World tracker, you should include some higher-risk areas such as emerging markets, smaller companies and alternative strategies. You could consider FSSA Asia Focus (GB00BWNGXJ86), which has good exposure to Asia Pacific markets; meanwhile, Columbia Threadneedle’s Global Smaller Companies Trust (GSCT) should benefit from any lowering in interest rates, as would NB Private Equity Trust (NBPE).

There are also several existing holdings I believe you should retain and, in some cases, increase for long-term capital growth, including JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI), Scottish Mortgage (SMT), Law Debenture (LWDB), AVI Global (AGT) and Polar Capital Technology (PCT). I also like Pershing Square (PSH), managed by Bill Ackman, and would recommend increasing your exposure to this trust to approximately 5 per cent of your overall portfolio.

I would suggest you sell your holding with Aberdeen. This is a mixed-asset fund investing across equities, bonds, and cash. Given your growth objectives and higher risk tolerance, an equity-based approach is more appropriate. The proceeds could then be reinvested into growth-oriented investments better aligned with your long-term goals.

I understand the desire to grow your money as fast as possible; you are not alone. However, as this money makes up the bulk of your wealth, a measured approach to risk is needed to protect the capital value from market volatility.

Simplifying the portfolio by reducing overlapping index funds and individual shareholdings, increasing exposure to high-quality actively managed funds and investment trusts and reallocating away from mixed-asset funds will improve diversification, reduce unintended concentration risk and better align the portfolio with your long-term goals.

Aiming for investment growth of around 14 per cent a year is an ambitious goal. A more realistic path might be trying for 8 per cent a year over eight years instead. It’s worth remembering that any short to medium-term investment period can deliver vastly different outcomes depending on global market behaviour, so flexibility and emotional resilience will be key.

Given your target and timeframe, your high equity allocation appears appropriate, although it comes with substantial risk. Equities can fall sharply during market turbulence, sometimes 40 per cent or more – so mental preparation for such volatility is essential.

Global index funds currently yield around 1 per cent, meaning that once you reach the £1mn milestone, generating roughly £10,000 in annual income should be achievable. At that stage, it could be sensible to switch from accumulation to income‑producing fund units.

If income remains lower than desired, consider directing part of your portfolio into Vanguard Global Equity Income (GB00BZ82ZW98). While this fund is actively managed, its fees are low and the yield sits close to 3 per cent, which should improve your portfolio’s overall income generation. You could also consider mixing in some exposure to bonds at this stage, which should increase the portfolio’s income as well as dampening its volatility.

You have four triple‑leveraged single‑stock exchange-traded products (ETPs) in your portfolios, which warrant caution for several reasons. You don’t own the underlying assets – these are synthetic products that carry counterparty risk. Their leveraged nature means a severe downside: if the artificial-intelligence‑driven rally reverses, your capital could be almost entirely wiped out. The average price/earnings ratio of the underlying holdings – Palantir, Spotify, Tesla and Nvidia – is around 160 times, far above the long‑term S&P 500 average of about 17.5 times. That level of valuation risk makes such leveraged exposure particularly precarious.

Leveraged ETPs also often involve hidden financing costs not reflected in their management fees. The implicit interest on borrowed capital can be several times the stated charge. Some UK trading platforms even impose mandatory stop-losses or stop-gains on leveraged ETPs, which can work against your strategy, especially in volatile markets.

As a rule, avoid leveraged ETPs altogether. If you ever use them, perhaps consider doing so only after a significant market correction, and only with index‑based leveraged products, which typically carry lower financing costs. Approach them purely as speculative plays, using capital you’re prepared to lose entirely.

A more prudent and sustainable route is to stick with unleveraged index trackers. They already provide robust market exposure and will still challenge your patience during downturns – but holding on and maintaining contributions through those periods is key to long‑term success.

The Alpha asset allocation model

James Norrington, Chartered FCSI and associate editor, has created four asset allocation strategies for Investors’ Chronicle Alpha and portfolio clinic case studies.

We’ve also applied a tactical asset allocation (TAA) framework to help investors position themselves for current market conditions. Fred has been recommended a ‘Moderate risk’ portfolio.

James says: “The moderate risk strategy is designed to maintain the sort of risk-on exposure to shares you need to achieve your goals, but with a safety rope. At the moment it is at its upper limit for investing in shares. However, the investments in Japan, Europe and the UK mean it isn’t betting the farm on American exceptionalism (even though the substantial MSCI World holding means it still has plenty invested in US shares).

“For December 2025, our TAAs have added a bit of duration to bond holdings, which means they could benefit from a fall in market inflation expectations. There is however some currency risk inherent in the strategic US dollar bond holdings, especially given some of the dynamics currently seen in international bond markets.”

News

News round-up: 2 January 2026

The biggest investment stories of the past seven days

Valeria Martinez
Valeria Martinez

Family farms and businesses worth up to £2.5mn will be able to be passed on tax-free after the government softened controversial inheritance tax (IHT) reforms following months of protests and pressure from farming groups and MPs. 

The original plans, set out in chancellor Rachel Reeves’ first Autumn Budget in 2024, would have limited full IHT relief to the first £1mn of qualifying agricultural or business property from April 2026.

Anything above that would face an effective tax bill of around 20 per cent, raising concerns that the changes would make it more difficult to pass farms on to the next generation. The proposals were quickly dubbed a ‘family farm tax’ by critics and sparked protests across the country.

In a statement published just before Christmas, the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said the threshold would be raised from £1mn to £2.5mn when the tax changes come into force in April. 

Ministers said they had “listened to concerns of the farming community and businesses about the reforms”. For married couples and civil partners, farm estates of up to £5mn can now be passed on without any IHT to pay, as they can combine two allowances of £2.5mn. 

Raising the threshold means fewer farms will face inheritance tax bills. According to official figures, the number of estates affected next year will fall from 375 to 186. VM


Harbour Energy (HBR) closed the year with another significant deal, this time a $3.2bn (£2.4bn) cash-and-shares acquisition that will take it into the Gulf of Mexico. The purchase of LLOG, a privately held US company producing around 34,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boepd), marks Harbour’s first entry into the US.

Its shares fell 4 per cent on the news, which was accompanied by a new dividend plan that allows more flexible payouts instead of the current flat $455mn distribution policy, as well as a $500mn share issue. 

LLOG put itself up for sale after the death of the company’s founder, Gerald Boelte, last year. Harbour chief executive Linda Cook said part of the deal involved retaining much of the LLOG team, given that her company has no US office at the moment. The current LLOG owners will become 11 per cent shareholders in Harbour. 

“The transaction positions us as a leading player in a region with well-established infrastructure, a supportive fiscal and regulatory environment and opportunities for additional growth,” said Cook. 

While current LLOG production is less than 10 per cent of Harbour’s 2025 average output, the deal price is largely in view of an expected doubling in production by 2028. This will require significant investment, however. 

“For LLOG, the transaction allows its private owners to achieve a clean exit in line [with] consensus expectations ahead of another bout of investment,” said SP Angel analyst David Mirzai. This is expected to be around $300mn a year until the end of the decade, compared with the total $2.4bn capital investment forecast for 2025, according to FactSet. 

The LLOG acquisition follows the $170mn purchase of North Sea assets from Waldorf International, which included significant tax losses as well as large stakes in the Catcher and Kraken fields. 

Cook said the Waldorf cash flow benefits, along with the $215mn sale of Indonesian assets, would “help fund our strategic entry into the deepwater Gulf through LLOG”, adding that “these three transactions are expected to materially increase our free cash flow between 2026 and 2030”. 

Harbour is funding the cash element of the deal partly through $2bn in new debt. Net debt soared through the Wintershall DEA deal that completed last year, and analysts see this figure sitting around $5bn for the next three years. AH 


One of the key planks of former BP (BP.) chief executive Murray Auchincloss’s 2025 strategy shift was the sale of Castrol to cut the energy giant’s debt. A buyer willing to hit BP’s valuation target has only emerged for 65 per cent of the lubricants business, however, with US private equity firm Stonepeak paying around $6bn for the stake. 

BP said the deal would provide “exposure to Castrol’s growth plan over the coming years, which builds on a strong track record of nine quarters of consecutive year-on-year earnings growth”. 

The company has a goal of hitting $14bn-$18bn in net debt by the end of 2027. This will mostly be through divestments, as it has also committed to spending big on new developments and holding on to share buybacks. 

The new chair, Albert Manifold, has already hired a new chief executive – Woodside Energy (AU:WDS) boss Meg O’Neill. Manifold has also reviewed Auchincloss’s reset strategy, announced in February, as well as the company’s portfolio. 

RBC Capital Markets analyst Biraj Borkhataria said selling upstream developments would have been a better long-term option for BP, as the Castrol sale means losing a “highly cash generative, low volatility and low capital intensity asset”. 

Maurizio Carulli, an analyst at Quilter Cheviot, said the sale was “a positive step forward for BP, reinforcing its ongoing ‘strategy reset’ and the aim to reduce its net debt and refocus its downstream business”. AH


Premier Inn owner Whitbread (WTB) has come under renewed pressure after US activist investor Corvex Management disclosed a 6 per cent stake in the FTSE 100 company and penned an open letter urging a review of its strategy.

The New York-based fund, which is now the group’s second-biggest single shareholder behind BlackRock (US:BLK), said the review should assess whether Whitbread’s five-year £3.5bn investment plan makes the best use of capital. 

Whitbread’s share price has fallen by almost a fifth over the past three months. In a statement, Corvex said the current market price “reflects not only a discount to the company’s fundamental value, but a discount to the value of the company’s fully owned and operated UK freehold hotel portfolio”.

The hospitality group’s property portfolio is valued at £5.5bn-£6.4bn, and management’s pursuit of a sale-and-leaseback model has proved contentious. Although the board expects to deliver £250mn-£300mn in gains from disposals for the full year, it means the company could be in for higher rental costs in the future.

Analysts at Citi blame weak sentiment on “investor concerns over the potential for an increase in UK costs”. For mid-market operators such as Whitbread, whose margins have already been squeezed by higher wage bills and rising food prices this year, just a small cost increase could put earnings under pressure.

Matters were not helped by the changes to business rates outlined in November’s Budget, which the board expects to cost £40mn-£50mn from FY2027. This compounded the impact of flat UK accommodation sales at Premier Inn, announced at the group’s interim results in October. 

In response to Corvex’s letter, a spokesperson for Whitbread said: “We run our business for the long term but remain flexible, and as stated in our announcement on 28 November, we are exploring various options to further drive profits, margins and returns in light of the impact of measures in the UK Budget.”

Corvex said it will seek a seat on Whitbread’s board as part of its campaign. EW


Rank Group (RNK) said its Spanish businesses, Enracha and Yo, had lost €7.1mn (£6.2mn) after falling victim to payment fraud. The casino operator said law enforcement had opened an investigation while it carries out its own internal probe with the help of an external law firm.

Peel Hunt analyst Ivor Jones believes it is unlikely that the group will recover any of the funds that were incorrectly transferred. “The group is in a financial position to absorb the cost and continue with its plans,” he said, adding the fraud is “unwelcome but of modest impact”.

As such, the broker has not changed its forecasts for the company, aside from adjusting its net cash expectations down by £6.2mn. Given the one-off nature of the incident, the fraud is expected to be treated as a separately disclosed item in Rank’s accounting.

The company said no material payments would be made without the approval of the chief financial officer while the internal investigation is ongoing as the group looks at ways to tighten controls further.

A challenging year for the gambling sector was capped by November’s Budget, which will raise digital gaming duties from 21 to 40 per cent in April. 

Like its peers, Rank expects the tax rises to hit profitability. The company flagged an anticipated operating profit hit of £40mn, and is currently assessing measures to mitigate the effect of higher levies.

Rank is due to report its interim results on 29 January. EW

Opinion

Anglo American: the retention issue

Paying more: a step too far? asks Paul Jackson

Paul Jackson

Mergers and acquisitions always increase pressure on senior executives, so should those executives be paid more for steering large ones through?

Anglo American’s (AAL) non-executive directors thought so. Ahead of the company’s general meeting due on 9 December, when shareholders approved the proposed ‘merger of equals’ with Teck Resources, they added a second resolution. This went beyond the limits of the remuneration policy that their shareholders had approved only a few months earlier – management were to receive a guaranteed 62.5 per cent of their existing long-term share awards on completion of the merger. The reason given for this apparently arbitrary number was that 25 per cent of the shares already awarded would vest once minimum performance targets have been achieved; the maximum is 100 per cent and 62.5 per cent is midway between the two.

The non-execs’ rationale was that on top of their day jobs of rationalising the group and improving performance, Anglo’s senior executive team are being asked to structure the more practical details of the proposed merger. “Successful delivery . . . will require exceptional performance by the Anglo American group’s senior management,” the board said. Dangling that carrot of guaranteeing existing share awards was deemed to be the best way to remove uncertainty about whether or not they’ll be paid more for all their extra effort to come.

The proposal was also for retention purposes – part of the anticipated $800mn (£595mn) of synergies will come from moving Anglo American’s corporate headquarters from London to Vancouver. Duncan Wanblad, who worked his way up through the group to become the chief executive in 2022, is to lead the merged entity, but a number of his new direct reports will be Teck people, so some Anglo American roles will no longer be needed. Many UK (and Canadian) executives, whose knowledge and cultural understanding will be vital, are likely to be wondering whether their jobs will disappear, or what their new reporting line will be. Those most valued tend to be ambitious and self-motivated and amid this uncertainty, as plum vacancies crop up elsewhere, they’ll be in the crosshairs of headhunters. Replacing them would be expensive – outsiders take months to get up to speed.

Wanblad is South African, where 70 per cent of the group’s 55,000 employees are based. Anglo American has operations around the world and many of its executives will not be averse to moving. Others may decline, perhaps for personal or family reasons, such as careers of partners or access to children. What about their pay? In similar situations in other companies, those who lost their jobs but remained fully engaged throughout have often found themselves well rewarded.

And the group does seem to pay its executives well. Wanblad received £4.4mn in 2024 and could receive £9.6mn this year if he exceeds all his performance conditions. This is before tax and most will be paid in shares, many of which can’t be sold for a couple of years. During his lengthy time in the group, he’s accrued shares worth over eight times his salary – double his contractual shareholding requirement.

There’s evidently no need to align his interests with shareholders – they already are. And so are those of many employees because Anglo American encourages them to participate in its voluntary share schemes. Anglo American shares are cyclical, which makes the UK all-employee savings-related share option scheme particularly appropriate – the share price has formed a bowl shape, almost doubling from the lows of a couple of years ago, when John Heasley, the finance director and other executive director, joined the group. His shares too must have gained in value, going some way towards his shareholding target of owning shares worth three times his salary in December 2028.

Retention payments are always controversial. In their shareholder circular, the directors muddied the issue by stressing the need to ‘incentivise’ and talked about ‘motivation’ – but for those paid well, money doesn’t motivate. What drives executives is the challenge of the role. The board also said that payment would be on completion of the merger, presumably meaning when Anglo Teck shares join the FTSE 100 – but key people will be needed to bed in the merged entity for many months afterwards.

Retention payments are always controversial. It could be argued that since the annual bonus and the potential shares previously awarded would become void if participants resign, there are retention mechanisms already in place. Are additional ones really necessary? Anglo American’s institutional shareholders had so many reservations that the pay resolution was withdrawn just before the meeting.

Theirs might be a ‘merger of equals’, but if all goes according to plan, in about a year’s time Wanblad and Heasley will be carrying out their current roles in a merged group half as large again as Anglo American. That will be the time for the new board to consider rewarding their executives with higher pay.

 

The Editor

What will rise and fall in 2026

The macroeconomic and market changes to expect this year

Rosie Carr

Investment strategies should only be tampered with for good reason, but the start of a new year is a good time to hold up asset allocations against the macro and market landscapes. 

There is rarely full agreement on these issues. But interest rates, inflation, borrowing and the employment rate are all expected to be heading in a downward direction. At its last meeting of 2025 the Bank of England (BoE) lopped another quarter point from the base rate, taking it to 3.75 per cent. The strong expectation is that rates will fall further, potentially to as low as 3 per cent, this year. Not everyone agrees on the level. At Pantheon Macroeconomics, Rob Wood remains cautious, expecting only one more cut.

The BoE and several analysts expect price growth to fall back to its target 2 per cent this year. Rising unemployment, which will curb wage growth (in the private sector at least) and slow consumer spending, is likely to be a factor in this. Capital Economics thinks the jobless rate will reach 5.2 per cent soon, up from 4 per cent in August 2024.

Falling rates and inflation will be supportive for businesses, but less helpfully household income growth is also expected to be in retreat as wage growth dwindles.

Public sector borrowing, which in just the first eight months of the 2025-26 financial year rose to the highest level ever (£132bn) outside the pandemic as public sector wages and welfare bills rose, is expected to drop back, largely due to the reduction in debt interest as inflation falls, the rising haul from frozen tax thresholds and new tax measures. After two big tax-raising Budgets, which will take the tax-to-GDP level to a record-breaking 38 per cent-plus, chancellor Rachel Reeves has not ruled out further tax rises. But Pantheon has serious doubts about Reeves’ smorgasbord tax approach and ability to cut spending. It warns that fiscal worries will soon dominate again.

Commodities had a good 2025, but Capital Economics is more bearish than others for the year ahead. It sees oil’s fall continuing and predicts that not only will the surge in silver (prices rose 120 per cent last year) go into reverse, but that gold prices will too – albeit not so steeply – as the structural driver of rising demand starts to weaken.

The heavy tax burden on UK businesses means domestic economic growth is expected to remain weak with little momentum. Capital Economics expects GDP growth to slow from around 1.4 per cent in 2025 to just 1 per cent in 2026. 

On the risers side, the US economy is expected to grow at a solid 2.4-2.5 per cent – analysts see AI productivity gains continuing to add to US GDP growth. Markets are expected to continue rising, if at a gentler pace than last year. The AI-ification of the world is expected to continue driving momentum in the US and China, with high expenditure keeping the rally going and pushing a potential correction into 2027. 

The UK’s attractive valuations and earnings strength should continue to draw in investors, and analysts mostly expect the level of takeovers of UK-listed companies to remain firm or even to rise in 2026. 

Aim may get a badly needed boost from changes outlined in the London Stock Exchange’s (LSE) recent proposals. Having initiated a discussion with participants on what changes would benefit the 30-year-old market, the LSE has outlined plans to reboot the junior market by channelling more investment into it, protecting tax incentives and stripping away the cost and regulatory friction that has held back growth. 

Away from markets, Britain could see a rise in non-dom departures. Recent high-profile wealth flights include that of Brevan Howard co-founder Alan Howard and steel mogul Lakshmi Mittal. And with 2025 ending with a hugely significant U-turn, it would be reasonable too to expect further such portfolio reversals in 2026. Having stuck rigidly to the line that the decision to force farming families to pay IHT on assets being passed down, not sold, was “right and fair” even in the face of growing opposition, the destructive policy has now been rewritten to raise (but not remove) the relief threshold.

U-turns, a hallmark of this government, are testament to both the unfeasibility of several of its big policies and weakness at the centre of Keir Starmer’s ‘centrist’ Labour. If the number of 18-year-olds out of work is not to keep rising, if the scale of high-net-worth individuals leaving the country is to be reversed and if Labour MPs are to ever feel welcome again in their local pubs, then business rate reforms (causing consternation in the hospitality and retail sectors), the new workers’ rights legislation and national insurance thresholds may all be the focus of concessions and changes in 2026.