Companies

SSP and Softcat: Big director share deals this week

Find out which directors are buying and selling shares in their own companies

Mark Robinson
Mark Robinson

Board buys in as SSP continues on road to recovery

When we covered full-year figures for SSP (SSP) earlier this month, we noted that the FTSE 250 constituent was in the midst of a restructuring plan with the aim of creating £30mn in annualised savings, of which £5mn had already been delivered during the year. Management also reiterated its target of £100mn in free cash flow for FY2026, a realistic enough ambition given that it achieved a positive free cash flow of £80mn over its last financial year.

None of this really amounts to full-scale remedial action, but SSP is focused on driving shareholder value as the group continues to trade at levels well below those seen prior to the Covid-19 pandemic. A £100mn share buyback initiated in October, coupled with this month’s results, has at least helped the shares erase their year-to-date losses. They remain 30 per cent lower on a five-year view.

The group, an operator of food and beverage outlets in travel locations, was hit hard by Covid-19, suffering a massive decline in sales due to the widespread collapse of domestic and global travel. As with some other companies, it also saw a marked increase in net debt as a proportion of the asset base.

SSP wasn’t the only listed entity whose trading volumes fell off a cliff due to the lockdown provisions, but it probably took longer than expected for footfall to recover at its various sites at home and across the globe. The group’s share price has retraced to a degree since publication of its preliminary figures, leaving the shares trading in line with peers at a median multiple of 3.4 times on an enterprise/cash profit basis.

Subsequent to the latest preliminary release, a handful of board members signalled their support through a series of share purchases, including an aggregate outlay of £325,162 by SSP’s chief executive Patrick Coveney and finance chief Geert Verellen. MR


Softcat finance chief in £300,000 show of support

There are any number of reasons why directors choose to build their personal holdings. But a second look is probably warranted when the insider in question is in charge of financial operations.

Softcat’s (SCT) chief financial officer Kathryn Mecklenburgh recently snapped up nearly £300,000-worth of shares in the IT reseller, a notable act of faith by any measure.

Softcat is often seen as a proxy investment for the wider IT market. While 2025 hasn’t been a troubling year, at least in terms of overall business volumes, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies’ capital demands, and valuations in this part of the market, have increasingly been put under the microscope. Separately, software companies have come under pressure due to worries about the impact of AI on their businesses.

None of the gathering doubts appear to have had an adverse impact on Softcat’s trading, though. Customer numbers have been on the rise, along with the group’s market share, while per client profitability has been increasing as business arrangements with its existing customer base mature.

The group trades on 13.9 times enterprise value to cash profit, a premium rating compared with peers, while a price/earnings growth (PEG) ratio of five times points to elevated growth expectations. Neither of these ratings, rich though they may be, have deterred Softcat’s finance chief. MR

Buys        
Company Director/PDMR Date Price (p) Aggregate value (£)
Baltic Classifieds Ed Williams * 05-11 Dec 180-189 799,394
BT Group Sunil Bharti Mittal * 04-05 Dec 179 8,777,772
Chemring Pete Raby 09-Dec 468.3 28,095
discoverIE Bruce Thompson (ch) 10-Dec 605.3 90,795
Domino’s Pizza Nicola Frampton (ce) 08-Dec 168.9 49,626
Dr. Martens  Robert Hanson 5-11 Dec 77-78.9 155,734
Insig AI Richard Bernstein (ce) 10-Dec 22.5 22,470
Jardine Matheson Lincoln Pan (ce) † 09-10 Dec 5,088-5,135 1,513,105
Jardine Matheson Ho Yin Chan (PDMR) † 09-Dec 5,200 301,600
Oxford Metrics Gary Bullard (ch) 09-Dec 43.6 47,495
Paragon Banking Richard Woodman (cfo) 08-Dec 808.3 121,245
Pennon David Sproul (ch) 09-Dec 536 24,844
Restore Patrick Butcher 09-Dec 261.7 49,950
Softcat Kathryn Mecklenburgh (cfo) 08-Dec 1,457-1,460 299,534
SSP Geert Verellen (cfo) 11-Dec 181 74,137
SSP Patrick Coveney (ce) 11-Dec 168 251,025
Trustpilot Adrian Blair (ce) 09-Dec 156.6 149,202
Unite Group Joe Lister (ce) 05-Dec 526 52,645
Unite Group Michael Burt (cfo) 05-Dec 522 52,224
Volex Dave Webster (ch) 8-10 Dec 408.3 461,700
Sells        
Company Director/PDMR Date Price (p) Aggregate value (£)
Georgia Capital Giorgi Alpaidze (cfo) 9-10 Dec 2,942 832,366
GSK Sally Jackson (PDMR) 05-Dec 1,828 109,722
Inchcape Byron Grote 08-Dec 758 37,900
Lion Finance Archil Gachechiladze (ce) 9-11 Dec 9,229 7,382,803
Lloyds Banking Group Jayne Opperman (PDMR) 09-Dec 95.3p 656,214
SSE John Stewart (PDMR) 08-Dec 2,149 316,951
*All or part of deal conducted by spouse / family / close associate. † Converted from US$/€
Economics

Economic fortnight ahead: 22 December-2 January

The key economic releases over the Christmas period

Dan Jones
Dan Jones

Monday 22 December

China: PBoC interest rate decision

UK: Current account, Q3 GDP


Tuesday 23 December

US: Current account, industrial production, PCE inflation (preliminary), Q3 GDP (preliminary), Richmond Fed manufacturing index


Wednesday 24 December

Japan: BoJ meeting minutes


Thursday 25 December

Japan: Industrial production (preliminary), leading economic index


Friday 26 December

None


Monday 29 December

UK: BRC shop price index, Nationwide house price index

US: Dallas Fed manufacturing index


Tuesday 30 December

Japan: Unemployment rate

US: Fed minutes


Wednesday 31 December

China: Manufacturing/non-manufacturing PMI


Thursday 1 January

None


Friday 2 January

Eurozone: M3 money supply, manufacturing PMI

US: Construction spending, manufacturing PMI

Companies

Utilico Emerging Markets & Vaalco Energy: Stock market calendar – 22 Dec-2 Jan

A summary of key company announcements expected in the coming fortnight

Mark Robinson
Mark Robinson

Economics: Current account, Q3 GDP

AGMs: Gelion (GELN), Grit Real Estate Income Group (GR1T)

Companies paying dividends: Cordiant Digital Infrastructure (2.175p), Octopus Apollo VCT (1.3p)


Companies paying dividends: Utilico Emerging Markets Trust (2.42p)


AGMs: Beacon Energy (BCE)

Companies paying dividends: Vaalco Energy ($0.0625)


Christmas Day


Boxing Day


Economics: BRC shop price index, Nationwide house price index

AGMs: Goldplat (GDP), SkinBioTherapeutics (SBTX)

Companies paying dividends: MHA (1p), US Solar Fund ($0.00875), Energean ($0.30)


AGMs: Europa Oil & Gas (EOG), SolGold (SOLG), Westminster Group (WSG)

Companies paying dividends: Abrdn European Logistics Income (10p), FirstGroup (2.2p), Foresight Environmental Infrastructure (1.99p), JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (5.75p), Temple Bar Investment Trust (3.75p), Triad (3p), Investec (17.5p)


Finals: Roadside Real Estate (ROAD)

AGMs: Frontier IP (FIPP), Genedrive (GDR), Iconic Labs (ICON), Time Out (TMO)

Companies paying dividends: Alliance Witan (7.08p), Imperial Brands (40.08p), Diversified Energy Co ($0.29), HICL Infrastructure (2.09p), NextEnergy Solar Fund (2.11p), The Renewables Infrastructure (1.8875p)


New Year’s Day


AGMs: Water Intelligence (WATR)

Companies paying dividends: Fuller, Smith & Turner (7.85p), JPMorgan UK Small Cap Growth & Income (3.63p), RS Group (8.7p), Real Estate Credit Investments (3p)

Companies going ex-dividend on 29 December
Company Dividend Pay date
British American Tobacco 60.06p 04-Feb
Netcall 0.94p 09-Feb
BT Group 2.45p 11-Feb
Value and Indexed Property Income 3.6p 30-Jan
Octopus AIM VCT 2.5p 27-Jan
Schroder AsiaPacific Fund 13p 06-Feb
Lowland Investment Company 1.7p 30-Jan
North American Income Trust 2.8p 30-Jan
Companies going ex-dividend on 2 January
Company Dividend Pay date
Ultimate Products 2.15p 30-Jan
Auto Trader 3.8p 26-Jan
F&C Investment Trust 3.8p 02-Feb
Big Yellow 23.8p 23-Jan
Shires Income 3.45p 30-Jan
CT Private Equity Trust 7.01p 30-Jan
Latham (James) 8.1p 23-Jan
One Health Group 2.1p 23-Jan
Schroder Japan 2.93p 30-Jan
Murray International 2.6p 17-Feb
Unicorn AIM VCT 3.5p 13-Feb
Ferguson $0.89 27-Feb
FINANCIAL PLANNING AND EDUCATION

A guide to the UK’s money safety nets

Moira O’Neill reports on the protections available if fraud, scams or a company collapse puts your money at risk

Moira O'Neill
Moira O'Neill

We live in an age when fraud and scams are rife. That means no financial institution is a 100 per cent safe home for your money.

Even large firms can get into trouble and leave customers waiting to get their money back, or in the worst cases not knowing if they will. The number of fraud cases in the UK rose by 17 per cent to 2.1mn in the first half of 2025, according to UK Finance. Developments in artificial intelligence (AI) raise the prospect of further increases in future.

Losing money in any scenario is horrible. It’s particularly scary if you need it to fund your retirement or to buy a home.

But there’s no reason to lose sleep if you take sensible steps to protect your money and know the institutions that can help you. The regulator and industry provide safety nets to help you get your money back and advice on ways to protect yourself from the scammers.

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) steps in to pay compensation if a regulated financial firm is no longer trading and cannot pay a claim. FSCS protection covers money held in bank, building society and credit union accounts. The FSCS also protects pensions, financial advice, insurance, investments, mortgage advice and arranging, debt management and funeral plans.

The body is financed by a levy on UK financial services firms that are authorised by the Financial Conduct Authority, although it is an independent organisation. Its service is free to customers, with claims made online.

The FSCS is aware that consumer confidence relies on its readiness to respond quickly when firms fail, so it is trying to simplify its processes to speed up claims and payments. It also proactively pursues recoveries of money from firms.

While FSCS protection limits (see below) were raised this December, for wealthy savers and investors, the limits may in some circumstances still feel insufficient. Meanwhile, each type of financial product has different protections attached to it and claims are only paid if certain requirements are met. So it’s important to know the service’s scope and limitations.

Cash should be a safe home for your money, but there are examples in living memory when it wasn’t. Take the collapse of UK bank Northern Rock in 2008 during the financial crisis due to its risky lending model. The government took the bank into public ownership, while several other UK banks faced collapse or required government intervention. The FSCS subsequently increased its compensation limits in response.

Today, if you hold money with a UK-authorised bank, building society or credit union that fails, the FCSC will automatically compensate you up to £120,000 of cash savings per eligible person, per bank, building society or credit union. Joint accounts are eligible for FSCS protection up to the same limit of £120,000 per eligible person.

The exception is NS&I, which is state-owned, meaning customers’ savings are guaranteed by the UK government, with no upper limit. This means it may appeal to those with large sums of money to save above the FSCS limit, as they don’t need to split their savings across multiple institutions to ensure full protection.

NS&I might also appeal if you’re transferring a large amount of money to purchase a house or receiving the proceeds from a house sale. That might only happen once or twice in your life and is when you’re most vulnerable.

Nevertheless, the FSCS also protects certain qualifying temporary high balances up to £1.4mn for six months from when the amount was first deposited. The intention is to protect money that comes from the proceeds of a house sale, a redundancy payment or benefits that were paid when you retired.

A common misunderstanding is that the £120,000 protection limit applies to every account that a customer holds. In fact, it applies per institution. It’s common for different high-street banking brands to operate under the same banking licence. Halifax, Bank of Scotland and Lloyds Bank are part of the same group, for example. Money spread across these different brands is aggregated under the £120,000 limit. The FSCS provides an online checker to help you find out which brands share protection.

You could also trip up when using digital wallets or pre-paid cards. The providers of these services may not have a full UK banking licence, which means they aren’t directly covered by the FSCS.

Stockbrokers and platforms act as an intermediary between you and where you want to invest your money. As regulated firms, they are prohibited from mixing their customers’ assets or cash with their own. This means if a provider goes under, your investments could not be used to pay its debts and would be returned to you. 

Cash held in your platform account is designated as client money, kept separate from the company’s cash, and deposited into different third-party bank accounts to avoid concentration risk. If anything happened to the banks holding the cash, you would be eligible for the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) regarding that money.

Your investments in shares, funds, investment trusts and exchange traded funds (ETFs) are also segregated from your investment platform’s own assets. They are held separately in a nominee account, which means they are legally separate from the platform’s assets and liabilities. 

Differing legal regimes exist overseas, though, which means non-UK assets may not be registered in the name of the platform’s nominee company and may therefore be subject to different treatment in the event of the platform’s failure.

The rules to protect clients’ money are part of the Client Assets Sourcebook (CASS), a critical part of the FCA’s regulatory framework. Breaches of CASS can lead to severe penalties and reputational damage.

However, critics point out that even highly regulated segregation of assets is not guaranteed to offer customers protection at the time that they need it most. That’s because an investment platform on the edge of collapse might be bad at keeping records of customers’ holdings or other administrative tasks such as reconciliation. In the worst case, if it’s being run by an unscrupulous management team, they might be tempted to “borrow” client assets to tide the firm over.

If something like this happens, the FSCS offers protection on investments held with stockbrokers and platforms, up to £85,000 per person, per firm.

In 2018, customers of the collapsed stockbroker Beaufort Securities were told they would be on the hook for the administration costs of winding up the business. The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) was there to compensate investors up to the set limit (at the time, £50,000). But some customers with larger amounts had to wait to get their money back, and a small number with amounts above the limit did not see all their money returned.

Even if you get your money back in a platform failure, you might lose out by being out of the market and unable to trade your investments while the lawyers and other parties unwind the business and sell off the assets. There might not be a formal timeframe on when you would be able to access your investments, which would be a source of distress if you had an imminent financial goal.

If you have a wealth manager or professional financial adviser, ask to see the due diligence they undertook when choosing a platform.

Some experts think it’s wise to focus on financially stable, large, UK-domiciled platforms. Those that are listed on the stock market will provide public announcements about their business status and plans, so you can get some sense of how financially stable the company is.

The industry promotes the advantages of consolidating investments to one platform or broker. This can result in reduced administration, lower costs, greater control of investments, and even extra cash – some platforms offer bonuses to new customers bringing in funds and existing customers who add to their investments.

But firms whose charges equate to a percentage of your assets receive more fees the more you hold with them. They also want more of your assets because having lots of small investors is trickier to administer.

If you are risk averse, you might still want to use more than one platform or stockbroker, just in case. It might also make sense to regularly print off or save a record of your holdings, perhaps once a year. If you trade regularly, you might prefer to do this more often.  

The FSCS does not protect customers from losses due to poor investment performance or market falls. Protection only applies if the investment firm itself fails and a shortfall of assets occurs.

If your money is invested in a fund, and the company that holds the assets for that fund goes bust because of negligence or fraud, this will fall under the FSCS. As long as you hold less than £85,000 with that company (or, technically, the licence that company is under), you will be protected. However, if you invest in multiple funds within a single investment firm, you are protected for £85,000 across that firm, not per fund.

In the case of the Woodford funds scandal, investors released their right to make a claim through the FSCS to instead receive payments from a redress scheme backed by the Financial Conduct Authority. However, they waited nearly five years to receive their first compensation payments.

If you hold shares directly in a company that goes bust, you will lose your money and the FSCS does not apply. It’s the higher risk that comes with an individual shareholding. If you’re really concerned about ownership of your shares, look for a Crest account. This is more expensive, and only available through a few stockbrokers, but enables you to prove your ownership.

Investment trusts are individual securities so FSCS rules do not apply. But there is the potential for an investment trust to be wound up before it goes bust, selling off its investments in the hope of returning some money to shareholders. You still may end up with less money than you initially invested.

In April 2024, the FSCS revealed that more than 43,000 claims had been received since 2019 for total pension losses reaching almost £2bn, in cases where authorised financial providers and advisers went out of business. Most of these claims came from men over 45, who are key targets for pension scammers.

Personal pension and stakeholder pensions provided by UK regulated insurance companies, plus annuities, are usually protected for up to 100 per cent of the claim value, with no upper limit, should the company fail.

However, the protection for self-invested personal pensions (Sipps) is limited to a maximum of £85,000, per eligible person, per firm. And if you’ve received bad advice in relation to your pension, you could be eligible to claim the same FSCS compensation.

For defined-benefit pensions, if your employer goes bust, you can get help from the Pension Protection Fund. This usually covers 100 per cent of the pension if you’ve reached the scheme’s pension age and 90 per cent if you are below it.

The Financial Conduct Authority has found that just one in 10 adults are not confident in their ability to identify a potential scam. Some of this confidence from the remaining nine out of 10 may be misplaced: online crime is rising fast, with scams becoming more sophisticated, so it pays to keep up to date with common types.

Stuart Morris, chief technology officer at anti-fraud and digital compliance expert SmartSearch, says: “Criminals now deploy deepfakes, cloned voices and convincing retail websites to harvest personal data or entire identities. We see daily how identity theft and online fraud adapt to each new innovation. The same tools that can generate creativity and learning can also be weaponised for deception.”

Voice cloning now requires just a few seconds of audio to create a convincing voice, while most video deepfakes can’t be told apart from real footage.

Criminals sometimes impersonate a friend or family member texting from a different number, often asking for money in a fabricated emergency situation. Scammers may also impersonate a legitimate business, like a parcel courier or government agency such as HMRC – to trick people into clicking on fake links to make payments or share sensitive information.

The FCA even received nearly 5,000 reports of scammers impersonating the financial regulator in the first half of 2025. Charlene Young, senior pensions and savings expert at AJ Bell, says: “With the promise of a windfall, the scammers will then try to persuade people to hand over sensitive bank information including account access and PIN details.”

Ofcom reported that half of UK mobile users said they received a suspicious message between November 2024 and February 2025 via text or iMessage. An estimated 100mn suspicious messages were reported to mobile operators through the 7726 service in the year to April 2025.

The FCA also says romance fraud is a growing financial crime, with cases rising by 9 per cent last year. Victims are deceived into sending money to fraudsters who engineer false romantic relationships or friendships. More than eight in 10 cases (85 per cent) start online, particularly through social media and dating websites.

If you’re scammed into making a bank transfer to a fraudster, your bank must now refund you in most cases – up to £85,000. A bank can only reject the claim if it finds you were really careless. For bigger losses, if you think the firm was at fault, you can complain to the Financial Ombudsman Service, which has a higher £430,000 limit.

If you think you’ve fallen victim to a scam, report it to Report Fraud (previously called Action Fraud) or Police Scotland.

Ways to be on your guard at all times

  • If something feels too good to be true, it probably is.

  • It’s OK to reject, refuse or ignore any requests.

  • Only criminals will try to rush or panic you.

  • Alarm bells should ring if someone you’ve only met online asks for money or suggests investments.

  • Get a second opinion from a family member or friend if you feel suspicious or uncomfortable.

  • Be wary of unsolicited calls, texts, emails or unregulated offers on social media.

  • If you’re at all suspicious on a call then simply hang up.

  • Check whether the contact is genuine by contacting the firm or organisation via their official website or app. You can call your bank by using the number on your bank card.

  • Also check that the company is registered with the Financial Conduct Authority before committing to anything: https://register.fca.org.uk/.

  • Be wary of phrases like ‘pension liberation’, ‘loan’, ‘loophole’, ‘savings advance’, ‘one-off investment’ and ‘cashback’.

  • Never send cash or share sensitive banking information such as online passwords or PIN details.

  • Establish family safe words to combat AI deepfake scams.

  • The FCA’s ScamSmart website includes a warning list of companies for individuals to be aware of: www.scamsmart.fca.org.uk

Funds

Fund to take advantage of the China rally

China is starting to look investable again. We look at the best fund options for the market

Val Cipriani
Val Cipriani

After a few years of enthusiasm for India and scepticism towards China, in 2025 the two biggest emerging markets traded places. India had a difficult year, while the MSCI China index rose 23.6 per cent in sterling terms in the year to 12 December.

Headwinds remain, including low consumer confidence and a fragile property market. But as Julian Hofmann explains, China’s equity markets now look more investable than has been the case for some time.

For many investors, the most straightforward option remains to use a broad emerging markets fund offering exposure to a range of countries to provide diversification. Emerging market investment trusts with significant exposure to China include JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Income (JEMI), which had 28.9 per cent of the portfolio in the country as at the end of September, and Pacific Horizon (PHI), which had 33.6 per cent as at the end of November.

Those who like a more focused approach via single-country funds also have plenty of options to choose from – although they need to be aware of concentration and overlap risks.

As is often the case with single-country indices, the MSCI China index is very concentrated at the top, with the two biggest companies, Tencent (HK:0700) and Alibaba (HK:9988), accounting for 29 per cent of the total as at the end of November. This strengthens the case for an active and more diversified approach; active managers running China-focused funds tend to hold both companies but on smaller weightings.

There are three investment trusts exclusively focused on China: Fidelity China Special Situations (FCSS), JPMorgan China Growth & Income (JCGI) and Baillie Gifford China Growth (BGCG). All three had an excellent 2025, with returns comfortably ahead of the index, as the chart below shows.

The trio are quite different but agree on some key principles, says Mick Gilligan, head of managed portfolio services at Killik & Co. They tend to avoid state-owned enterprises, particularly banks, “where alignment with minority shareholder interests is questionable, given their use as policy tools by the government”, and favour consumer stocks and non-politically sensitive sectors instead.

In the long term, the Fidelity trust has been by far the biggest outperformer. Gilligan favours it over the other two for its “valuation-conscious approach, scope for additional returns from the pre-IPO unquoted holdings and liquidity”. The trust had 10.3 per cent in unlisted companies as at the end of October.

“The trust also has a bias to small and medium-sized companies, where lower levels of research by competitors leads to greater opportunities for mispricing,” he adds. Gearing is also one of its distinctive features, and currently stands at around 29 per cent; as ever, this can enhance both positive and negative returns.

Baillie Gifford China Growth also has a 10.3 per cent exposure to unlisted companies via a single holding, ByteDance, which is the owner of social media platform TikTok and the second-largest position in the portfolio. The trust takes a growth approach, which was out of favour in the years before 2025, meaning the managers have a lot of underperformance to make up for. They look for “innovative businesses with sustainable competitive advantages”.

JPMorgan China Growth & Income is notable because, like several of the asset manager’s other trusts, it pays out 4 per cent of its net asset value (NAV) in dividends every year, which can make it attractive for income investors. The trust is significantly overweight to the technology and industrials sectors, which accounted for 22.1 per cent and 19 per cent of its portfolio as at the end of October, respectively. It also has a small allocation to Taiwan, including 2.6 per cent in Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TW:2330).

Its fourth-biggest holding is electric vehicle (EV) maker Xiaomi (HK:1810), at 4.4 per cent of the portfolio as at the end of October (against 3.2 per cent for the MSCI China index). The trust only bought the company at the start of this year, with managers Rebecca Jiang and Li Tan noting in March that it had done well thanks to strong demand for EVs, good execution and price competitiveness.

“Xiaomi has also benefited from a ‘halo’ effect, as the success of its EVs has generated great demand for its other product lines, including smartphones and household appliances,” they said. “We missed the initial rally in Xiaomi in late 2024, as we underestimated the company’s execution capability in its EV business.”

The three trusts are fairly concentrated, with their top three holdings accounting for between 28 and 30 per cent of the portfolio. They all trade at similar discounts to NAV – as at 12 December, this amounted to 8.7 per cent for JPMorgan China Growth & Income, 9.6 per cent for Baillie Gifford China Growth and 10.9 per cent for Fidelity China Special Situations.

Darius McDermott, managing director at FundCalibre, also suggests two open-ended funds for dedicated exposure to China. One is Allianz China A-Shares (GB00BMG9ZZ41), which he says is “managed by one of the longest-standing and most experienced teams operating directly in the mainland A-share market”.

A-shares are stocks listed in mainland China, in Shanghai or Shenzhen, and valued in Chinese renminbi – as opposed to B-shares, which use foreign currencies. A-shares were once only available to domestic investors, but are now partly accessible to foreign investors. “With a high proportion of retail investors and limited analyst coverage, the A-share market remains large, inefficient and full of mispricing,” McDermott adds.

The other fund he suggests is FSSA Greater China Growth (GB0033874321), which is a little different because it has significant exposure to Taiwan, at 29.6 per cent of the portfolio – TSMC is the fund’s biggest holding. This is important to keep in mind to avoid overlap with any other broad emerging market fund you might hold.

“This strategy has successfully aligned itself with China’s structural growth story since the country joined the World Trade Organization in 2001,” says McDermott. “The journey hasn’t been smooth, and investors have needed conviction to hold through periods of uncertainty – but those who have stayed invested have been well compensated.”

Performance
Fund/trust/index 1-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr
MSCI China index 23.6 30.2 -12 103.7
Fidelity China Special Situations (FCSS) 42.6 39.2 -9 179.9
JPMorgan China Growth & Income (JCGI) 34 -1.5 -42.9 143
FSSA Greater China Growth (GB0033874321) 9.7 7.4 -1.1 141.5
Baillie Gifford China Growth (BGCG) 37.1 19.4 -34.7 62.6
Allianz China A-Shares Equity (GB00BMG9ZZ41) 28.8 7.8 -16 -
Sterling total returns to 12 December. Source: FE
News

News round-up: 19 December

The biggest investment stories of the past seven days

Alex Hamer
Alex Hamer

Oil companies are continuing to roll up assets in the North Sea in an effort to cut down tax bills and keep fields in the black. This week, Harbour Energy (HBR) and Serica Energy (SQZ) bought up stakes in the UK continental shelf, while earlier in the month French giant TotalEnergies (FR:TTE) combined its North Sea assets with those jointly owned by Repsol (ES:REP) and private equity vehicle HitecVision.

Harbour’s $170mn (£127mn) deal included 40 per cent of the Catcher field, taking its stake to 90 per cent, and 29.5 per cent of the Kraken field, operated by EnQuest (ENQ). The added exposure comes as a surprise after Harbour very publicly shifted investment out of the UK over what it has said were onerous fiscal conditions. The seller was Waldorf International, a private company in administration.

“This transaction is an important step for Harbour in the UK North Sea, building on the action we have already taken to sustain our position in the basin given the ongoing fiscal and regulatory challenges,” said Scott Barr, managing director of Harbour’s UK business unit.

Serica Energy, on the other hand, has continually looked to expand its North Sea holdings in what it says is a buyer’s market.

The latest deal will see it take a set of North Sea holdings from Centrica (CNA) subsidiary Spirit Energy for £57mn. This includes various stakes in 10 fields, adding a total of 10,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boepd) to Serica’s portfolio for 2026, mostly through gas production, an increase of around 20 per cent on current output. Serica also closed the Prax Upstream acquisition last week.

Serica’s shares are down 20 per cent since late November, although it remains up 23 per cent year-to-date.

Serica chief executive Chris Cox, who used to run Spirit Energy, said: “There is also the potential for further infill drilling opportunities across the portfolio, most significantly at Cygnus, where drilling is ongoing.”

Shore Capital analyst James Hosie said the deal was “another example of industry consolidation within the UK”, adding that “Serica and its peers [are looking] to realise tax and operational synergies in response to the current fiscal and regulatory regime, while others seek to exit”.

The industry had pushed the government for an end to the energy profits levy in last month’s Budget, but chancellor Rachel Reeves confirmed that the 38 per cent charge on top of the 40 per cent corporate rate paid by producers would continue until 2030. The oil price is well below the floor that defines the ‘windfall’ nature of the energy profits levy, but the tax will only be scrapped ahead of time if gas prices fall below their own floor. The post-2030 regime should be friendlier to companies, however.

It will drop the headline tax rate from 78 per cent to 40 per cent, with a levy on sales when oil is above $90 per barrel and gas above 98p per therm. SP Angel analyst David Mirzai said the latest deals had been triggered by “the recent clarity on the oil and gas regulatory and fiscal changes”. AH


Shares in outsourcer Serco (SRP) jumped after the group upgraded its full-year profit guidance and said 2026 profits are likely to come in ahead of market expectations.

The company left revenue and organic growth guidance unchanged but said underlying operating profit is now expected to be around £270mn this year, ahead of consensus of £260mn, with a margin of 5.5 per cent. Free cash flow (FCF) guidance was also raised to £170mn, up from £130mn.

Order intake is expected to reach £5.5bn, with a book-to-bill of at least 110 per cent and roughly two-thirds of awards coming from defence. Serco anticipates year-end adjusted net debt of £265mn, equivalent to 0.9 times earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda).

First guidance for 2026 points to revenue of around £5bn, with organic growth improving to 3 per cent. Underlying operating profit is guided to be £300mn, up 11 per cent and ahead of consensus of £285mn, implying a margin of 6 per cent. FCF is set to come in at £160mn.

Serco also announced the retirement of chief financial officer Nigel Crossley after 11 years with the company. Mark Reid, CFO of Belgian telecoms company Proximus since 2021, will take over in March. Serco’s shares are trading at their highest point in more than a decade, climbing 5 per cent this week and 75 per cent year-to-date, to 270p. VM


Bunzl (BNZL), one of the FTSE 100’s worst performers this year, confirmed that its full-year results would land in line with expectations set alongside its April profit warning, but investors were newly rattled by a lacklustre outlook for 2026. Shares fell by as much as 6 per cent in early trading and are down more than a third year-to-date.

The distributor of consumables such as packaging, cleaning products, personal protective equipment and catering supplies reiterated its 2025 adjusted operating profit guidance, with a 7.6 per cent margin, alongside expectations for “broadly flat” organic revenue.

Management expects to see “good momentum” over the final quarter, helped by actions taken to address underperformance in North America and continental Europe. Even so, analysts at Panmure Liberum estimate that fourth-quarter sales fell slightly, following a 0.8 per cent drop in the third quarter.

Bunzl expects the pace of margin decline to ease in the second half. But that offers little comfort looking ahead, as the company warned that economic and geopolitical uncertainty would persist next year. It expects “moderate” revenue growth at constant exchange rates, driven by “some” organic growth and a small benefit from acquisitions.

UBS expects growth to be largely led by volumes, with pricing broadly flat as deflationary pressures offset the annualisation of tariffs. Crucially, though, operating margins are expected to edge lower next year given ongoing cost inflation and little benefit from price rises, suggesting that a recovery is still some way off.

“[We] are encouraged by operational improvements being made and new business wins in North America,” said chief executive Frank van Zanten. “We have presented our view of 2026, which highlights our expectations for a return to organic growth and ongoing cost actions to support a more stable profit outlook.”

The company completed its £200mn share buyback during the year and acquired Slovakian distributor Damito in October. It expects leverage to end 2025 at just over 2 times Ebitda. VM


Hikma Pharmaceuticals (HIK) has parted ways with chief executive Riad Mishlawi two years after he assumed the helm at the generic injectables business. The company said the change had been by mutual agreement.

The shares were marginally down in reaction on Monday, but the 25 per cent decline in Hikma’s share price this year reflects a difficult generics market.

Said Darwazah, Hikma’s executive chair and former CEO, will assume all operational responsibilities with immediate effect.

The company emphasised that none of its guidance had changed since a trading update in November; this means that group revenue is still expected to grow in the range of 4-6 per cent, with a slightly narrower core operating profit coming in at $730mn to $750mn.

Senior management changes have happened quickly at the company. In November, the head of Hikma’s injectables division, Dr Bill Larkins, announced that he was leaving at the end of the year. JH


Diageo (DGE) has agreed to sell its Kenyan operations to Japanese drinks group Asahi (JP:2502), as part of the drink-maker’s efforts to streamline its portfolio.

Diageo Kenya owns a 65 per cent stake in East African Breweries (KE:EABL) and an interest in Kenyan spirits company UDVK. The sale of the unit and its holdings is expected to raise $2.3bn (£1.7bn) and is set to complete in the second half of next year.

The FTSE 100 group said it has agreed a long-term licence with East African Breweries to ensure the “continued production and distribution of Guinness, local spirits and ready-to-drink brands” in the region.

The deal includes the Senator, Tusker and Serengeti beer labels. “With a strong brand portfolio and operational efficiency initiatives, the business offers high growth potential and stable profitability,” said Asahi.

After a bumpy 18 months marked by senior departures, Diageo has focused on divesting non-core assets to strengthen its balance sheet under interim chief executive Nik Jhangiani.

The shares are down by a third over the past year. Jefferies analyst Edward Mundy said the Kenya sale could “temper the debate around potential dividend cuts”.

The company has pinned its hopes on former Tesco (TSCO) boss Sir Dave Lewis to turn things around when he takes the reins from Jhangiani in January.

“There is some investor debate as to whether the new CEO looks to accelerate deleveraging through cutting the dividend, similar to the playbook at Tesco early on in his tenure a decade ago,” said Mundy. EW

News

Not just Trump: Our 2025 investing wrap

The FTSE 100 was a world-beater, but just one of many high performers for IC readers this year

Alex Hamer
Alex Hamer

Government action has defined 2025. Or inaction, in some cases. Business leaders have tried to pre-empt what the occupants of the White House and Downing Street are planning, but largely they have been at the mercy of politicians.

Donald Trump has dominated headlines this year through wild trade policies, efforts at peace in the Middle East and Ukraine and his assistants’ financial dealings from within the White House.

But the biggest shock was his so-called “liberation day” in April. Trump had promised trade tariffs before being re-elected, but what he delivered was far beyond what was expected.

Here in the UK, interest groups of all kinds called for radical change to rev up the economy, but the government managed to annoy almost everyone with higher taxes that won’t fully fund the significant spending increases on much of the country’s infrastructure.

The FTSE 100 turned into a top performer thanks to its global exposure, capturing both the local performance of the high-street banks and defence spending rises among the western allied nations.

Despite dropping behind the UK’s blue-chip exchange, the US market remained the driver of global returns despite Trump’s shock tactics in the first half.

This was because executives at the tech giants at the top of the S&P 500 quickly learned to deal with him by making extravagant local spending promises. Nvidia (US:NVDA) has recently even received permission to send some of its most advanced chips to China, in exchange for giving the US government a 25 per cent cut, largely through the personal efforts of chief executive Jensen Huang. 

Markets certainly recovered quickly from the tariff hit. Even before it was clear that Trump was likely to back down, the S&P 500 took less than a month to get back to previous levels. The tech giants in particular have accepted an erratic White House occupant given that the trade-off is carte blanche to build their artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure.

That continued rollout, alongside promises and contracts now into the hundreds of billions of dollars, has led to significant anxiety over the mutually assured destruction approach of the top AI companies. This is another way of describing the ‘circular’ deals done by Nvidia and ChatGPT maker OpenAI, among others. Yet Nvidia’s profits have climbed enough that, remarkably, its valuation is still only a fraction ahead of the wider market.

In the UK, the government kept up the business-friendly rhetoric in the lead-up to the Autumn Budget, trying to both encourage investment and raise additional revenue for the state.

The general malaise was hard to get past, however. Years of inflation have already eroded people’s disposable income despite wage rises, and businesses are furious at the triple whammy of higher general operating costs, wages and taxation brought on by both last year’s and this year’s Budgets. Investors will also now be hit by higher taxes on dividends and savings. 

Financial services lobbyists did at least score a win in this year’s Budget with a stamp duty holiday for newly listed shares. 

Peel Hunt analyst Charles Hall, prolific in his calls for capital markets reform in recent years, said the holiday was a good start but “as a country we definitively have to address stamp duty more generally if we want to be globally competitive”.

Before November’s fiscal statement, chancellor Rachel Reeves said broader market reforms were “bearing fruit” after several floats in October, and there has been a generally positive response to updating the London Stock Exchange listing categories last year. New arrivals overall remain far lower than the number of companies being bought out or merging, although IPO specialists predict improvement next year, thanks to the looser listing rules. 

Institutional outflows from UK shares continue, according to Calastone data, but as Peel Hunt also noted, this has come at the same time as the “FTSE 100 has been buoyed by greater interest from global investors”.

So the dour domestic sentiment is largely shown by the FTSE 250, which was a full 10 percentage points behind the FTSE 100 in growth terms this year.

The stellar performance of the senior index was carried by the sectors mentioned above, but the top performers were precious metals miners Fresnillo (FRES) and Endeavour Mining (EDV), while Rolls-Royce (RR.) continued its share price run from 2023 and 2024. Airtel Africa (AAF) was another standout thanks to rising customer numbers and profits, although it has a limited free float. Babcock (BAB) carried the defence torch.

Biggest FTSE 100 risers
Company Share price move, year-to-date (%) Industry
Fresnillo 370 Mining
Airtel Africa 181 Telecommunications
Endeavour Mining 160 Mining
Babcock 143 Defence
Rolls-Royce 93 Civil aerospace and defence

Investors piled in to the first two companies for the obvious reason that profits would soar due to the rise in gold and silver prices. Rolls-Royce has been a momentum play for the past two years at least, but 2025 saw profit expectations continue to be upgraded thanks to the performance of its civil aerospace and power systems divisions. It also has the added benefits of defence and nuclear power exposure, areas investors have been wild for this year. 

Those top performers also show that government intervention isn’t everything. There are some links, of course – the UK and the US have committed to either permitting or building new nuclear plants, while gold has been helped by the uncertainty around the White House’s trade policies and disregard for debt levels. The FTSE 100’s worst performer was advertising and marketing giant WPP (WPP), which is down 60 per cent year-to-date on the loss of large clients and fears of the impact of AI on its industry.

Biggest FTSE 100 fallers
Company  Share price move, year-to-date (%) Industry
WPP -60 Advertising
Diageo -34 Beverages
Bunzl -33 Distribution
Mondi  -27 Packaging
Hikma Pharmaceuticals -24 Generic pharmaceuticals

In 2025, the MSCI All-World Index, which is weighted heavily towards the US, has recorded a total return behind the prior year’s (16 per cent against 24 per cent). But improved performance was visible in several other regional markets: for instance the Dax, as well as the FTSE, did better thanks to the shift into more defensive stocks.

In commodity terms, there were a few small players that outdid gold, but it was the yellow precious metal that shone, peaking at over $4,300 an ounce (oz) in October and December. The uncertainty when it fell below $4,000 in between shows just how expectations have changed. Is the next milestone going to be $5,000 or $3,000 an oz? The former looks more likely on momentum alone. 

Silver stole the limelight at the end of the year, making up some ground on the senior precious metal. Also ahead of gold on a year-to-date basis were tungsten, cobalt, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium and platinum. The first three saw rises on the back of security of supply or export bans. 

The good news is that platinum group metal mining companies have struggled for so long that further gains should easily impress the market and push share prices up further. 


Companies

Profiting from the surveillance state

Coming to a website near you . . . 

Mark Robinson
Mark Robinson

I would think that anyone with children under the age of 16 would applaud efforts to curb the online activities of their progeny. It’s ironic that at a time when engagement with online communities continues to bubble up, teenage loneliness is cited as one of the more worrying side effects of the social media age.

But new legislation recently enacted by the Albanese government in Australia is providing a litmus test for teenage mental health issues and the extent to which state intervention in the media is justifiable.

The new law, which is technically an amendment to an earlier act of parliament, prohibits minors under the age of 16 from holding an account on certain social media platforms – the likes of Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, Snapchat, TikTok and X (formerly Twitter). Civil liberties bodies in Australia are already mulling legal challenges, as some believe that it infringes constitutional protections linked to “freedom of political communication”.

Some commentators and homegrown politicians believe the legislation could eventually be seen as a template for other countries, thereby influencing the commercial direction of social media companies, while conceivably bolstering the investment case for traditional and specialist media. It could also lead to enhanced commercial volumes for companies engaged in online security, identity (ID) management, encryption, threat detection and software patching.

Social media companies that fail to take adequate measures to ensure teenagers are unable to access their content could be on the hook for fines as high as A$49.5mn (£24.5mn). Platforms must verify the age of users through digital ID functions, not just governmental records. They are also required to destroy collected data, lest they incur further fines for privacy breaches.

Doubtless the parent companies of the sites in question will be keen to push the free speech angle, if not in a bid to reverse the legislation then to hinder its potential spread across the western world.

It’s strange to think that even the Chinese Communist party has resisted the temptation to implement a complete social media ban for teenagers, instead opting for ‘minor mode’ constraints with daily time limits, curfews and content filters – a rather more liberal approach.

Ultimately, it would not be surprising if this legislation metastasises across other jurisdictions. Australia was the first country to adopt plain tobacco packaging, a move that was subsequently aped across the globe. When it comes to social media, the European parliament recently agreed to a resolution calling for a default minimum age of 16 for accessing such platforms, arguing it would ensure “age-appropriate online engagement . . . unless parents or guardians have authorised their children otherwise”. It also called for a harmonised EU age limit of 13, under which no minor would be permitted to access social media, including so-called ‘AI companions’: customisable 2D/3D avatars that engage in humanlike simulated conversations which reputedly provide emotional support for some teenagers.

Given the troubling prospect of teenagers turning to digital ‘friends’, it is difficult not to feel some sympathy towards those legislators who sincerely want to address the issue, but a cynic might take the line that it has more to do with the continued spread of the surveillance state.

Many adults who regularly access social media may find it galling to be asked to furnish digital IDs and/or facial scans, or go through third-party verification processes after they may have been accessing the same apps for years.

Beyond the simple inconvenience, the change will entail handing biometric data to a third-party verification vendor, with all the attendant implications linked to data breaches, identity theft, fraud and unwarranted surveillance. The risks outlined here – and many more besides – also inform the arguments being put forward in opposition to the proposed introduction of a broader mandatory digital ID system in the UK.

If other countries follow Australia’s lead, there are some material implications worth taking on board. True, the exclusion of the under-16 cohort will have a limited economic impact on social media companies, but the risk for them is that it could alter consumer behaviour over the long term, thus reducing (or reallocating) advertising revenues in the process. There is also the possibility that some adults will give up on social media altogether if they feel that the verification process is too intrusive, thereby accelerating any exodus to traditional channels.

Advertisers seeking to re-engage with the teen demographic may shift budgets to traditional media outlets, although one imagines that the latter would be forced to adapt to their new audiences’ expectations.

We would be reluctant to second-guess an organisation’s motives, but it’s interesting to note that News Corp Australia launched a ‘Let Them Be Kids’ campaign midway through 2024, alongside a petition to ban children under 16 from accessing social media.

The debate over digital privacy is likely to rumble on for the foreseeable future. And the matter is complicated by the ongoing rollout of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The extent to which social media becomes a curated space remains open to debate. We know that any future restrictions on under-16s stand as a potential benefit for the legacy media after two decades of relative decline, but what about the providers of digital ID technologies?

ORACLE CORPORATION (US:ORCL)    
ORD PRICE: $184.63 MARKET VALUE: $530bn
TOUCH: $184.24-$184.82 12-MONTH HIGH: $346 LOW: $118
DIVIDEND YIELD: 0.9% PE RATIO: 35
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY: $10.42 NET DEBT: $105bn
Half-year to 30 Nov Total net revenues ($bn) Pre-tax profit ($bn) Earnings per share ($) Dividend per share ($)
2024 27.4 6.56 2.19 0.80
2025 31.0 9.77 3.19 1.00
% change +13 +49 +46 +25
Ex-div: 09 Jan
Payment: 23 Jan
*Includes intangible assets of $66bn, or $22.96 a share.

Larry Ellison’s Oracle (US:ORCL) has been touted as a potential beneficiary of any data changes in the pipeline, specifically in relation to digital ID. Domestically, the involvement of the group is contentious due to Ellison’s long-standing relationship with former prime minister Tony Blair, and the latter’s supposed influence on UK government policy. The reality is that Oracle already handles much of the government’s cloud infrastructure, so concerns over corporate influence at the heart of the UK’s digital ID infrastructure may be unavoidable.

The US corporation’s shares have been on a rollercoaster ride this year, and were recently subject to an 18 per cent markdown after it posted a slight revenue miss and a pronounced rise in capital expenditure for AI data centres within its second-quarter update. The upshot is that the group’s valuation is down by around 40 per cent since its September high, the point at which Oracle revealed a $300bn (£223bn), five-year contract to supply OpenAI with cloud services through a joint venture called ‘Stargate’.

Total quarterly revenues were up by 13 per cent at constant currencies to $16.1bn, while cloud revenues rose by a third. Hardly disastrous on the face of it, but anxieties over the stock, and subsequent volatility, are linked to Oracle’s exposure to ChatGPT’s creator, which is feeding in to gathering concerns over financial risk and the potential for an AI bubble.

The recent sell-off means that Oracle now offers implied upside of 65 per cent based on the FactSet target price consensus of 45 analysts. A homegrown option, in the form of GB Group (GBG), is also worth examining given that it, too, offers sizeable implied upside – 48 per cent. The fraud protection business has been moving its customer base towards a subscription-as-a-service model designed to boost retention and repeat business.

Oracle’s exposure to OpenAI will inform the investment case ahead of any further market corrections, so it is understandable why Ellison would be rather keen to tap into the UK’s expanding surveillance programmes. The UK digital identity market is already generating more than £2bn in annual revenues, and that is expected to double by the end of the decade in response to rising demand from the financial and healthcare industries. But if you are looking to profit from the spread of digital ID technologies, it’s worth keeping in mind that they are likely to take on an even greater political dimension by the time of the next election.

News

Private healthcare stocks caught out by NHS squeeze

Spire Healthcare’s profit warning underlines a worrying trend for the whole market

Julian Hofmann
Julian Hofmann
  • Higher NHS spending isn’t flowing down

  • Structural weakness exposed

As winter pressures mount and headlines once again warn of an NHS under strain, the assumption has been that independent hospitals would be the main beneficiaries. Patients frustrated by long waits increasingly turned to private options in the aftermath of the Covid-19 pandemic, while politicians continued to emphasise the role of the independent sector in tackling record waiting lists.

Against that backdrop, the 3 December profit warning from independent hospital operator Spire Healthcare (SPI) came as a shock.

The market was deeply unsettled not because it pointed to waning demand for healthcare, but because it exposed how abruptly changes in NHS commissioning budgets can affect earnings – and how little protection private providers have when it does.

Spire’s management blamed the shortfall squarely on a spending slowdown at integrated care boards (ICBs), the regional NHS bodies responsible for purchasing care on behalf of the NHS.

At first glance, that sits uneasily with news of rising NHS budgets and persistent waiting lists. But a closer look suggests Spire is exposed to a structural vulnerability that the market had underestimated.

The problem is that while NHS spending has returned to growth in real terms, most ICBs are operating under severe financial pressure. Their priority is to keep core NHS services running, so commissioning elective work from independent operators becomes a discretionary luxury.  

This is exacerbated when costs rise unexpectedly, either through a harsh flu season or industrial action by doctors, and private elective work is one of the few areas where spending can be cut quickly.

NHS England figures show that independent sector elective admissions had already slipped around 3.4 per cent from their post-pandemic peak by late summer. What appears to have changed towards the end of the year, however, is not the direction of travel but the severity.

Commissioning volumes are typically signed off in advance, with providers often being paid for extra work if they exceed their agreed volumes.

However, ICBs have recently started enforcing strict caps and apparently threatening non-payment for overruns. That behaviour is unusual, and it removes the funding flexibility that private providers have historically relied on.

The financial consequences are amplified by operational gearing. While the reduction in NHS revenue implied by Spire’s downgrade is modest in absolute terms, a large proportion of the income lost dropped straight through to earnings.

As staffing and other fixed costs cannot be cut quickly, particularly if management expects activity to recover, the result is a disproportionate hit to profits. Panmure Liberum analyst Seb Jantet estimates that for Spire a £40mn drop in NHS revenue translates into a £25mn reduction in earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (Ebitda).

Crucially, Spire is not alone in the sector and other independent hospital operators are facing similar issues. Indeed, the NHS’s budget problems has the power to cross continents.

For example, Ramsay Health Care’s (AU:RHC) UK business is even more dependent on NHS volumes than Spire’s, particularly in orthopaedics. While the UK arm is not listed, investors have started to factor these pressures into the valuation of the Australia-listed parent. Its shares have suffered bouts of sharp weakness this year after earnings downgrades highlighted problems in its UK and European operations. This included a A$291mn (£144mn) impairment on the value of its UK mental health business Elysium.

Other knock-on effects could be felt across the sector next year. As NHS volumes are capped, independent providers are likely to compete more aggressively for insured patients. That raises the risk of pricing pressure, particularly for operators with a high fixed cost base.

For Spire, the timing is uncomfortable. The group has spent the past year increasing NHS volumes, partly to offset softer private markets, and partly in response to government signals that the independent sector would be needed. That strategy now looks exposed. While self-pay demand is improving, and private medical insurance volumes are broadly stable, neither is yet strong enough to absorb the NHS slowdown without pain.

From a valuation perspective, Spire gives investors plenty to ponder. Even after forecast cuts, the shares trade on an enterprise value to Ebitda multiple of 7.1 for 2026, and free cash flow yields are set to improve over the medium term, according to research from Panmure Liberum.

The broker said the profit warning might spur on the ongoing shareholder value review, with a possible byproduct that shareholders might be more open to selling the company at below 300p a share. The shares currently trade at 166p.  

For now, Spire’s profit warning is a reminder that the independent healthcare market remains tightly coupled to the financial health of the public system.

Given how squeezed the NHS is by various cost increases, ranging from pay levels to higher national insurance contributions, that may not prove to be a comfortable position.

Ideas

Bag bargain global stocks and income with this trust

There’s no better way to diversify your income than with a discounted and reliable dividend payer

Val Cipriani
Val Cipriani

Income investors are naturally drawn to the UK market, where they can find plenty of fat, reliable yields. But diversifying your sources of income is also crucial – and you can do that with a global income investment trust that is currently trading well below its net asset value (NAV).

Scottish American Investment Company (SAIN) invests in a portfolio of quality companies from across the world which are able to grow their dividends. The trust looks for stocks that can “deliver dependable income now and real capital growth over time” and aims to increase its own dividend at a faster rate than inflation. On average, it has grown its payout by 4.6 per cent a year over the past five years.

Scottish American bull points

  • Portfolio of quality companies

  • Very different from the index

  • Reliable, growing dividend

The trust has a venerable history. It has been around since 1873 and is one of the top 10 ‘dividend heroes’ in the Association of Investment Companies’ (AIC) list, having increased its payout over each of the past 51 years. It has been run by Baillie Gifford for more than two decades and remains somewhat of an outlier for the fund house, which is otherwise known for its all-out growth strategy.

Until mid-2023, Scottish American had been doing a remarkable job of delivering on its income goal while also achieving long-term growth, broadly keeping up with the global stock market in total return terms. But since then, markets driven by a handful of US tech stocks have been detrimental to its performance compared to the index, as the chart below shows.

This year, global markets started to broaden out, but this didn’t help Scottish American. In a video on the trust’s website, manager James Dow explains that the areas that did well were mostly artificial intelligence (AI) on one side, and the likes of banks and utilities on the other, to which the trust has limited exposure.

“Some narrow parts of the market have been rewarded by shareholders and the rest of the market has gone nowhere,” he says. “The trouble for Scottish American is that the bits of the market doing well are not typically very good sources of resilient income growth over long periods.”

Scottish American bear points

  • Recent underperformance

  • Could struggle if quality companies remain out of favour

This underperformance has pushed the trust’s shares to a discount, and as at 10 December they were trading 9.6 per cent below its NAV. This makes it the cheapest of the AIC’s global equity income sector by some measure, with the other four trusts trading just above or below their NAV.

This is not wholly without reason. Scottish American puts more emphasis on income reliability and growth. Unlike peers such as JPMorgan Global Growth & Income (JGGI), it doesn’t pay dividends out of capital, and its dividend yield is the lowest in the group at 3 per cent. But this strategy also makes its payout less volatile, preventing it from falling in the years when the portfolio goes down in value, which is very important to investors who rely on portfolio income to fund their day-to-day spending.

The trust’s portfolio looks very different from its benchmark, the FTSE All-World index. As at the end of November, Scottish American only had 37.5 per cent in North American companies, compared with the index’s 63 per cent exposure to the US. Instead, it was overweight to Europe and the UK, at 32.9 per cent of the portfolio.

The trust is very underweight to the ‘Magnificent Seven’; Microsoft (US:MSFT) and Apple (US:AAPL) are its largest and third-largest holdings, but none of the others feature in the top 10. The second-biggest holding is Taiwanese chipmaker TSMC (TW:2330). Looking beyond the top three, we find a series of companies operating in less glamorous sectors, including consumer goods giants such as Procter & Gamble (US:PG) and Coca-Cola (US:KO).

Top 10 holdings
Company Weighting (%)
Microsoft 3.7
TSMC 3.6
Apple 3.6
Procter & Gamble 2.7
CME Group 2.6
Coca-Cola 2.5
Atlas Copco 2.5
Analog Devices 2.2
Roche 2.2
Deutsche Börse 2.1
Total 27.6
As at 30 November. Source: trust factsheet

The managers divide the portfolio into four types of compounders, as they explain in the trust’s latest interim report. ‘Everyday royalties’ have well-established positions in markets, grow roughly in line with GDP and sell “everyday items at very low risk of disruption – think coffee and lipstick” (Coca-Cola is an example). ‘Share gainers’ such as Fevertree (FEVR) capture market share “through superior products or services”, it continued. ‘Market expanders’ have rapid rates of compounding; TSMC is an example.

Finally, there are ‘adjacency builders’, or companies that “leverage their competitive advantages in core markets to expand into adjacent industries”, the interim report explains. “Atlas Copco (SE:ATCO-A) is a standout example. Starting as a leader in air compressors, Atlas Copco pioneered oil-free technology to enter sensitive markets like food production and pharmaceuticals.”

The trust also has a 9.3 per cent exposure to property. Compared with open-ended funds, one of the distinctive features of investment trusts is that they can hold illiquid assets. Scottish American has a direct portfolio of 11 properties of various kinds, ranging from a motorway service station to a holiday village and a warehouse. It also invests in infrastructure stocks (3.3 per cent of the portfolio as at last June). The alternatives portion of the portfolio is likely to deliver lower levels of growth than the rest of the trust’s equity holdings, but helps ensure the reliability of the dividend.

The trust’s recent underperformance was partly caused by stocks that have been having an especially rough time, pharmaceutical company Novo Nordisk (DK:NOVO.B) being a case in point. The company was the trust’s biggest holding as at June 2024 (4.2 per cent of the portfolio), but its share price is down by around 50 per cent so far this year in local currency terms.

As at this June, the trust’s managers still had some conviction in the company. “Our base case is that in the years ahead, Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly (US:LLY) will trade positions as both continue to improve their obesity drugs: sometimes Eli Lilly will be in the ascendant (as now) and other times it will be Novo Nordisk (as was the case a couple of years ago),” they said. “So as the market for these drugs grows significantly in the years to come, we still expect Novo Nordisk to deliver strong growth in earnings and dividends.”

But given that Novo’s issues were big enough that it had to replace its chief executive, the managers added that they would be reviewing the investment case.

Procter & Gamble has also struggled, with the shares down by about 15 per cent in 2025 so far. The managers noted in June that many consumer staple stocks have been having a hard time.

“Not long ago, many of these companies were raising their prices substantially to offset cost inflation, and they were widely praised by investors for their ability to preserve margins,” they said. “Many of them were also enjoying the benefits of volumes surging and customers up-trading to premium products, as people everywhere celebrated the end of lockdowns.” Much of the slowdown, they said, can actually be attributed to the “short-term unwinding of this mini-boom”.

Whatever the stock specifics, Scottish American has a long record of combining reliable income with capital growth over time, and the discount offers investors the opportunity to buy its portfolio at a cheaper price.

Quality companies have been out of favour for a while, and it is hard to predict when this will change, especially while AI remains the focus for investors. But these are solid businesses with much to offer and could perform well if AI doesn’t deliver on its promises. As they wait for a re-rating, investors can enjoy the trust’s reliable and growing income.

Scottish American Investment Company (SAIN)
Price 504p Gearing 6%
AIC sector Global equity income Total assets £981mn
Fund type Investment trust Share price discount to NAV -9.60%
Market cap £830mn Ongoing charge 0.58%
Launch date 31/03/1873 Dividend yield 3%
More details https://www.bailliegifford.com/en/uk/individual-investors/funds/scottish-american-investment-company/
Source: AIC. As at 10 December 2025.
Performance
Fund/trust/index 1-yr 3-yr 5-yr 10-yr
Scottish American 1.5 7.8 25.5 164.2
FTSE All-World index 13.5 57.7 72.9 243.1
AIC global equity income sector 3.5 29.6 47.6 163.5
As at 10 December. Source: FE